Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

Hi, 2009/12/15 Peter Pentchev : > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:46:28AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > Maybe I'm being a bit stupid here (happens to me all the time, > really :)), but I just don't see what is wrong with a rules file > like this.  Could you please explain a bit further what you think > n

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 02:46:28AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello, > > 2009/12/10 Peter Pentchev : > > * Package name    : mbuffer > >  Version         : 20091122-1 > >  Upstream Author : Thomas Maier-Komor > > * URL             : http://www.maier-komor.de/mbuffer.html > > * License         :

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 03:32:52AM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > Hello again, > > my clarification follows. > > fredag den 11 december 2009 klockan 02:13 skrev Hector Oron detta: > > Hi, > > > > 2009/12/11 Mats Erik Andersson : > > > out of curiosity: Does mbuffer now prefer libmhash over

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

Hello again, my clarification follows. fredag den 11 december 2009 klockan 02:13 skrev Hector Oron detta: > Hi, > > 2009/12/11 Mats Erik Andersson : > > out of curiosity: Does mbuffer now prefer libmhash over libssl? > > That has been troublesome in the past. > The documentation of the upstream

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

Hello, 2009/12/10 Peter Pentchev : > * Package name    : mbuffer >  Version         : 20091122-1 >  Upstream Author : Thomas Maier-Komor > * URL             : http://www.maier-komor.de/mbuffer.html > * License         : GPL-3+ > * Language        : C Is there any reason for this debian/rules? $

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

Hi, 2009/12/11 Mats Erik Andersson : > out of curiosity: Does mbuffer now prefer libmhash over libssl? > That has been troublesome in the past. $ cat 01-md5-gnutls.patch Description: Use the MD5 routines from GnuTLS instead of OpenSSL. Avoid linking to OpenSSL for license reasons. Forwarded: not

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

Hello, out of curiosity: Does mbuffer now prefer libmhash over libssl? That has been troublesome in the past. -- Mats Erik Andersson fredag den 11 december 2009 klockan 00:34 skrev Hector Oron detta: > Hi! > > 2009/12/10 Peter Pentchev : > >> > Nobody interested? :) > >> > >> Bump? :) > > I wo

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

Hi! 2009/12/10 Peter Pentchev : >> > Nobody interested? :) >> >> Bump? :) I would like to first sponsor your package if posible, please be patient until I find out details to join debian mentors. -- Héctor Orón "Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar System, whic

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:45:28PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:27:26PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > Dear mentors, > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of my package > >

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:27:26PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of my package > > "mbuffer" - a simple tool for buffering data streams for various > > purpo

Re: RFS: mbuffer (new package)

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:27:26PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of my package > "mbuffer" - a simple tool for buffering data streams for various > purposes, including writing to block devices, testing throughput, > and many othe

RFS: mbuffer (new package)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the initial upload of my package "mbuffer" - a simple tool for buffering data streams for various purposes, including writing to block devices, testing throughput, and many others. * Package name: mbuffer Version : 20090628-1 Upstream A