On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 23:14:37 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:31:56AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I've reuploaded it to m.d.n, and placed it on
> > http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/ too
> > (http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/mail-notification_5.4.dfsg.1-2.5.dsc).
>
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:31:56AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> I've reuploaded it to m.d.n, and placed it on
> http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/ too
> (http://www.sk2.org/mail-notification/mail-notification_5.4.dfsg.1-2.5.dsc).
Uploaded. I already wrote you last time that I think, that you s
Hi Sven,
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:26:59 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:16:40AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > In the meantime though, would any one like to sponsor the NMU?
>
> I wanted to take a look at it over the weekend but parts of the
> package went missing from ment
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:16:40AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi,
> In the meantime though, would any one like to sponsor the NMU?
I wanted to take a look at it over the weekend but parts of the
package went missing from mentors.d.n. I made Arno aware of it
in #debian-metors.
Maybe you can reup
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:08:57 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > OK - do you have any pointers to migration documentation? The main
> > > intent of the NMU was to fix the FTBFS, not really overhaul the whole
> > > package, but it would i
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
Hi,
> > OK - do you have any pointers to migration documentation? The main intent of
> > the NMU was to fix the FTBFS, not really overhaul the whole package, but it
> > would indeed be better to avoid leaving predictable future FTBFSe
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 08:12:43AM +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:43:37 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 07.09.2011 00:57, schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This
> > > update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual E
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 02:43:37 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 07.09.2011 00:57, schrieb Stephen Kitt:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This
> > update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual Evolution updates,
> > which also require a switch to GTK+
Am 07.09.2011 00:57, schrieb Stephen Kitt:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This
update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual Evolution updates,
which also require a switch to GTK+ 3);
Hm, the package still build-depends on libgtk2.0-dev, is that
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package "mail-notification". This
update would fix a couple of RC bugs (the usual Evolution updates,
which also require a switch to GTK+ 3); I've also included a number of
fixes for bugs with patches in the BTS, and activated SSL
support. (See the m
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:51:55PM +0800, LIU Qi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
Hi,
> > Please follow up with mia@ to check the current state of the process.
> > I didn't add the DMUA+Uploader flag because that should definitely not
> happen
> > in a NM
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 10:42:06AM +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi Sven,
> first of all I've uploaded the package. Thanks for fixing it once again.
> I didn't test the evolution part so I hope that works as well. (flame me
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:25:40AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi,
first of all I've uploaded the package. Thanks for fixing it once again.
I didn't test the evolution part so I hope that works as well. (flame me later
if it breaks ...)
> As far as I'm aware LUI Qi is MIA (mia have been notified)
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 23:03:33 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:15:17AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Note that I should soon be a DM, so if you do sponsor my package and deem
> > it appropriate, I'd appreciate a DMUA field. (This is my third NMU of this
> > package; I'll glad
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:15:17AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
Hi,
> Note that I should soon be a DM, so if you do sponsor my package and deem it
> appropriate, I'd appreciate a DMUA field. (This is my third NMU of this
> package; I'll gladly adopt it once it's orphaned.)
Without some more detail
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.4.dfsg.1-2.3
of my package "mail-notification".
It builds these binary packages:
mail-notification - mail notification in system tray
mail-notification-evolution - evolution support for mail notification
The package appears to be lin
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:38:01 +0100, Christoph Egger
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 04:37:30PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.4.dfsg.1-2.1
> > of my package "mail-notification".
>
> Could you maybe tell next time you want a NMU sponsored? I
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 04:37:30PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.4.dfsg.1-2.1
> of my package "mail-notification".
Could you maybe tell next time you want a NMU sponsored? I don't
like having to pick such facts from the version when looking a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.4.dfsg.1-2.1
of my package "mail-notification".
It builds these binary packages:
mail-notification - mail notification in system tray
mail-notification-evolution - evolution support for mail notification
The package appears to be lin
19 matches
Mail list logo
