Dear mentors,
I am the maintainer of "luma", looking for a new sponsor.
My current sponsor (mornfall) told me that he is very busy
and that I should look for a more responsive one.
It builds these binary packages:
luma - gui utility for accessing and managing LDAP database
The package app
Charles Plessy wrote:
> these are excellent reasons for hijacking the package. Would you be
interested?
Yes and yes!
I was able to reach mornfall and he uploaded my changes.
He was listed with a dead email on that package, so that would have been
the reason for not showing any reaction before.
M
Le Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:30:51PM +0100, Per H. a écrit :
> Kartik Mistry wrote:
>
> > 1. You are not maintainer of package. Package is not Orphan or RFAed.
> > Have you discussed this with current maintainers?
>
> MIA...
>
> After nobody reacted on #481968 I wrote to Bjorn about a year ago and
Kartik Mistry wrote:
> Per wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4-0.1
>> of my package "luma".
> 1. You are not maintainer of package. Package is not Orphan or RFAed.
> Have you discussed this with current maintainers?
MIA...
After nobody reacted on #481968 I wrote to Bjorn
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Per H. wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4-0.1
> of my package "luma".
Hi,
(I haven't check package but following are first observations)
Thanks for your work, but:
1. You are not maintainer of package. Package is not Orphan or RFAed.
Have
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.4-0.1
of my package "luma".
It builds these binary packages:
luma - gui utility for accessing and managing LDAP database
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 443201, 460022, 481968
The pac
6 matches
Mail list logo
