On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:44:45PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
> > [...]
> > > The follo
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:43:52PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
> [...]
> > The following packages have been kept back:
> > liferea
>
> I've got a question on your transi
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:39:28PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> [Note: I updated the package to backport a patch from 1.2.5, which
> both a reporter and upstream agree should close #379900. Please, if you
> deem the package uploadable, do grab the new version first, from the
> same UR
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:08:36PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > I suspect you need the third horseman of the package apocalypse,
> > > Replaces:,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > > What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> > What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
> > out a
> > Provides: liferea-gtkhtml
> > to the liferea package, with no res
6 matches
Mail list logo
