> Hi Damien,
Hi Varun,
[...]
> The new package still fails to build on many archs and I am
> not sure why. Could you please check?
There is some massive libraries transitions ongoing in unstable.
Since yesterday (11/03), there is +3000 uninstallable packages [2].
In our issue, default-jdk isn't
Hi Damien,
On Wed, 11 Mar, 2009 at 10:45:30PM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Hi Varun,
>
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote:
> > Hi Damien,
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sp
Hi Varun,
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Hi Damien,
>
> On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-5
> > of package "libmx4j-java" :
>
> Looks good. Uploaded.
It's t
Hi Damien,
On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-5
> of package "libmx4j-java" :
Looks good. Uploaded.
Cheers,
Varun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-5
of package "libmx4j-java" :
* Apply patch mx4j-remove-invalids-providers.patch to remove invalid
service provider from META-INF/services/. Closes: #504664.
* debian/control:
- Move all java libraries to Build-Depends
5 matches
Mail list logo