Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-22 Thread LI Daobing
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 23:37, Monty Taylor wrote: > LI Daobing wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing wrote: >>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor wrote: Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package version to

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-21 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing wrote: >> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package >>> version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If you

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-21 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing wrote: >> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package >>> version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If you

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-21 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 08:30, LI Daobing wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor wrote: >> Hi! >> >> libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package >> version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If you >> have a chance, could you

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-19 Thread LI Daobing
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 05:27, Monty Taylor wrote: > Hi! > > libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package > version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If you > have a chance, could you take a look at it for me? > consider always post the .dsc URL. I

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-19 Thread Monty Taylor
Hi! libmemcached 0.29 was released today, so I have uploaded a new package version to mentors. It also adds a -dbg package closing #529285. If you have a chance, could you take a look at it for me? Thanks! Monty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-16 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 00:22, Monty Taylor wrote: LI Daobing wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor wrote: LI Daobing wrote: 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as memstat.

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-16 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 00:32, Matthias Julius wrote: > LI Daobing writes: > 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file. >>> >>> Is that a policy/best practice for library packages? >> >> ok, consider there is no conclusion here. you can keep this file there. :) >

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-16 Thread LI Daobing
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 00:22, Monty Taylor wrote: > LI Daobing wrote: >> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor wrote: >>> LI Daobing wrote: >>> 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as memst

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-14 Thread Matthias Julius
LI Daobing writes: >>> 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file. >> >> Is that a policy/best practice for library packages? > > ok, consider there is no conclusion here. you can keep this file there. :) But there seems to be a preference to remove it if rdepends don't need

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-14 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor wrote: >> LI Daobing wrote: >> >>> 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same >>> file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as >>> memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian >>> http:

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-14 Thread LI Daobing
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:35, Monty Taylor wrote: > LI Daobing wrote: > >> 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same >> file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as >> memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/m

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-13 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:35 -0700, Monty Taylor wrote: > > > 3. consider remove the .la file if you already have a .pc file. > > Is that a policy/best practice for library packages? > > I've uploaded a new copy to mentors with 1 and 2 fixed. I'd like to > know > more about 3 before making that c

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-12 Thread Monty Taylor
LI Daobing wrote: > 1. the debian policy version should be 3.8.1 Oops. > 2. /usr/bin/memstat in libmemcached-tools is conflict with the same > file in memstat package[1], one solution is install it as > memstat.libmemcached and document this in README.Debian > http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mem

Re: RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-12 Thread LI Daobing
Hello, On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:58, Monty Taylor wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libmemcached". > > * Package name    : libmemcached >  Version         : 0.28-1 >  Upstream Author : Brian Aker > * URL             : http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html >

RFS: libmemcached

2009-05-11 Thread Monty Taylor
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libmemcached". * Package name: libmemcached Version : 0.28-1 Upstream Author : Brian Aker * URL : http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html * License : BSD Section : libs It builds these binary