Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread William Ballard
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:44:18PM -0400, Ervin Hearn III wrote: > -- Your .sig is malformed. It should be "-- " not "--". I have .muttrc set to display sigs as black text on black background because god knows I don't want to read y'alls stupid sigs. :-)

Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread Ervin Hearn III
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 05:04:24PM -0400, Ervin Hearn III wrote: > > Thanks, I aprpeciate all of the feedback. I'm rather embarrassed > about the lintian and linda errors. I'll take care of those asap. > I'll also continue to familiarize myself with the ruby policies and > clean up some of the oth

Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread William Ballard
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 08:44:18PM -0400, Ervin Hearn III wrote: > -- Your .sig is malformed. It should be "-- " not "--". I have .muttrc set to display sigs as black text on black background because god knows I don't want to read y'alls stupid sigs. :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread Ervin Hearn III
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 05:04:24PM -0400, Ervin Hearn III wrote: > > Thanks, I aprpeciate all of the feedback. I'm rather embarrassed > about the lintian and linda errors. I'll take care of those asap. > I'll also continue to familiarize myself with the ruby policies and > clean up some of the oth

Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread Ervin Hearn III
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:45:41AM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote: > > Tha package itself (at least the contents) seems to be well placed. > However, it has lots of glitches. > > First of all, lintian and linda both complain with some errors: [snip errors and suggestions] > It is widely needed

Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread Ervin Hearn III
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:45:41AM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote: > > Tha package itself (at least the contents) seems to be well placed. > However, it has lots of glitches. > > First of all, lintian and linda both complain with some errors: [snip errors and suggestions] > It is widely needed

Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 00:35, Ervin Hearn III wrote: > I would like to make another request for a sponsor of my libezgtk-ruby > package. I have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have been > maintaining the unrelated PennMUSH package, which is also looking for a > sponsor, over the last 9 months.

Re: RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-08 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 00:35, Ervin Hearn III wrote: > I would like to make another request for a sponsor of my libezgtk-ruby > package. I have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have been > maintaining the unrelated PennMUSH package, which is also looking for a > sponsor, over the last 9 months.

RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-07 Thread Ervin Hearn III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to make another request for a sponsor of my libezgtk-ruby package. I have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have been maintaining the unrelated PennMUSH package, which is also looking for a sponsor, over the last 9 months. So, I'm not

RFS: libezgtk-ruby - Wrapper Interface of GTK+ for Ruby #2

2004-08-06 Thread Ervin Hearn III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to make another request for a sponsor of my libezgtk-ruby package. I have gotten my gpg key signed by a DD and have been maintaining the unrelated PennMUSH package, which is also looking for a sponsor, over the last 9 months. So, I'm not en