Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-04-07 Thread Joachim Langenbach
Dear readers, it took some time to process the hints. Nevertheless I fixed the most of the mentioned errors. There are three errors left, related to symbol files. As I understood the documentation, the symbol file should list all symbols, provided by the current binary packages. Therefore I hav

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 08:56:11AM +0100, Helmut Grohne a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:58:22PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > >> 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. > > > Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actua

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-26 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 06:58:22PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: > >> 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. > > Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a > > recommendation, not a rule. Thanks. > ok, agree, my "typo". But

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Anton Gladky
On 02/25/2013 05:37 PM, Andrew Shadura wrote: > Hello, > >> 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. > > Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a > recommendation, not a rule. Thanks. > Hello, ok, agree, my "typo". But I think it is desirable to ask for DEP-5 for

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, On 02/25/2013 07:52 AM, Joachim Langenbach wrote: >> 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to "stable" >> release. It is impossible. Use "unstable" instead. Also you should put >> your name there. > > So this stable or unstable line refers to the distribution status the pack

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, > 6) Copyright-file must be in DEP-5 format. Please don't say 'must' when you're speaking about what's actually a recommendation, not a rule. Thanks. -- WBR, Andrew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-25 Thread Игорь Пашев
2013/2/25 Joachim Langenbach : > Without the dependencies to binary packages defined in this package (like > dependency of libengsas0-common from libengsas0), right? I think libengsas0-common should be kept. Also, probably 0 should be removed from its name: libengsas0-common -> libengsas-common

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-24 Thread Joachim Langenbach
Hi Anton, thanks for your review. Since I did not understand the reason for some of them, I have some questions. > 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to "stable" > release. It is impossible. Use "unstable" instead. Also you should put > your name there. So this stable or uns

Re: RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-24 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Joachim, thanks for trying to bring a new software into Debian. A couple of notes/questions about your package: 1) changelog says, that you are targeting the software to "stable" release. It is impossible. Use "unstable" instead. Also you should put your name there. 2) compat-level 7 is relati

RFS: libengsas packages

2013-02-24 Thread Joachim Langenbach
Dear debian developers, I'm looking for a sponsor for my libengsas packages. It is a Qt based library, which main goal is to provide platform independend and common API for using KDE libs or Qt only. For example it provides a QFileDialog replacement, which uses the KFileDialog when KDE is enabl