Re: RFS: libcares

2007-11-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Nov 27, 2007 9:34 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has all become unneeded work > > http://packages.debian.org/sid/libc-ares1 > > /me sighs and smiles at the same time :) I guess you'll be more careful when opening WNPP bugs in future. > My final version was upload to men

Re: RFS: libcares

2007-11-27 Thread Robin Cornelius
On Nov 23, 2007 2:31 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2007 7:10 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So it think that is now all the issues you raised with the package dealt > > with. > > Some minor issues (only the first is a show-stopper): This has all becom

Re: RFS: libcares

2007-11-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Nov 23, 2007 7:10 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it think that is now all the issues you raised with the package dealt with. Some minor issues (only the first is a show-stopper): inet_ntop.c isn't under the MIT licence as debian/copyright suggests. Change: /--- Develop

Re: RFS: libcares

2007-11-23 Thread Robin Cornelius
On Nov 20, 2007 5:09 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007 6:53 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Which way do you suggest I should go with the naming? I can recreate a > > c-ares package if required or stick with the libcares name. > > I suggest: > > source

Re: RFS: libcares

2007-11-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Nov 19, 2007 6:53 PM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which way do you suggest I should go with the naming? I can recreate a > c-ares package if required or stick with the libcares name. I suggest: source package: c-ares: because the upstream tarball is named this way lib binary

Re: RFS: libcares

2007-11-19 Thread Robin Cornelius
Paul Wise wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007 5:53 AM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcares". > > Awww, Debian definitely needs more caring, here is a review of your package. > > Upstream source package is c-ares rather than libcares, any reaso

Re: RFS: libcares

2007-11-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Nov 19, 2007 5:53 AM, Robin Cornelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcares". Awww, Debian definitely needs more caring, here is a review of your package. Upstream source package is c-ares rather than libcares, any reason for the change? No Homepage

RFS: libcares

2007-11-18 Thread Robin Cornelius
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcares". * Package name: libcares Version : 1.4.0-4 Upstream Author : Daniel Stenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/ * License : MIT Section : libs It buil