>>> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me.
>>> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
>> That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made
>> similar experiences.
>
> It's just too common to be "the default route".
>
>> I know wh
> On 16.01.2012 23:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me.
>> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
>
> That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made
> similar experiences.
It's just too common to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sergey,
On 16.01.2012 23:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me.
> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and
> You seem to misunderstand the DM status.
I don't think so, but thank you for explanation.
> It is not a Debian Developer
> Lite. It does not mean you, as a DM, are trusted to upload any given
> package to Debian at any time.
It just a meaningless thing for now. See below.
> If you got DM sta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sergey,
On 16.01.2012 17:28, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
> Looks like DM does not make sence at all :(
>
> I'm waiting for upload for months just in case of very
> simple changeset (e.g. for rpaf or php-memcached).
You seem to misunderstand the
> before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get
> the bug fixed.
Thank you.
>> I'm sorry, but that was noted in comments. Feel free to drop this
>> control field.
>
> Droped.
>
>> > I don't see how I can judge if you're able to handle the package or not.
>>
>> E.g. by lo
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 01:48:52PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Hi,
before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get
the bug fixed.
> > in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload
> > of this package a few month ago) but I don't like people setti
Hello,
> in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload
> of this package a few month ago) but I don't like people setting DMUA
> on public sponsoring requests.
I'm sorry, but that was noted in comments. Feel free to drop this
control field.
> I don't see how I can judge i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 02.01.2012 11:38, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> I'm not sure how near we're to new Apache release but maybe the
> deprecation notice would be more appropriate in a NEWS file?
> But maybe that can wait until we acutally have it in Debian.
Httpd 2.4
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:36:51PM +0300, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
Hi,
> It builds those binary packages:
> libapache2-mod-rpaf - module for Apache2 which takes the last IP
> from the 'X-Forwarded-For' header
in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload
of this package
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-rpaf".
Package name: libapache2-mod-rpaf
Version : 0.6-3
Upstream Author : Thomas Eibner
URL : http://stderr.net/apache/rpaf/
License : Apache
Section : httpd
It builds those binary pa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the NMU version 0.6-0.2
of my package "libapache2-mod-rpaf".
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-rpaf - module for Apache2 which takes the last IP from the
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/de
12 matches
Mail list logo
