On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:51:31PM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for LDAP Account Manager.
> The ITP bug number is 208406.
> Homepage: http://www.sf.net/projects/lam
> Source package (0.4-2):
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-all/ldap-account-
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 06:51:31PM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for LDAP Account Manager.
> The ITP bug number is 208406.
> Homepage: http://www.sf.net/projects/lam
> Source package (0.4-2):
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-all/ldap-account-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am looking for a sponsor for LDAP Account Manager.
We recently released our first beta version (0.4) and the new package
should conform with the Debian policy.
The dynamic configuration files are now in
/var/lib/ldap-account-manager. They w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I am looking for a sponsor for LDAP Account Manager.
We recently released our first beta version (0.4) and the new package
should conform with the Debian policy.
The dynamic configuration files are now in
/var/lib/ldap-account-manager. They wil
Hi, Craig Small wrote:
> Why cannot objectclasses be added? I have done that several times.
That's a limitation in the LDAP server. I filed a bug about this a few
months ago, but they said this is how things are supposed to work. :-/
Clients usually do that by deleting and recreating the object
Hi, Craig Small wrote:
> Why cannot objectclasses be added? I have done that several times.
That's a limitation in the LDAP server. I filed a bug about this a few
months ago, but they said this is how things are supposed to work. :-/
Clients usually do that by deleting and recreating the object
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 07:53:56PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> Sorry for that, hopefully you have a backup of your account.
No, it was some scramble to get that working, luckily I had
directory-manager running and could add my account back.
> This problem occurs only when the edited account has
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 07:53:56PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> Sorry for that, hopefully you have a backup of your account.
No, it was some scramble to get that working, luckily I had
directory-manager running and could add my account back.
> This problem occurs only when the edited account has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig Small wrote:
| This reminds me. It has a serious lack of error correction problem.
| I tried editing my account got to the end, had a problem (i suspect
| that i was missing an objectclass and had syntax checking on) and it
| destroyed my accou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig Small wrote:
| This reminds me. It has a serious lack of error correction problem.
| I tried editing my account got to the end, had a problem (i suspect
| that i was missing an objectclass and had syntax checking on) and it
| destroyed my account
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:09:32PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> At the moment all user accounts have an objectClass samba(Sam)Account
> and it is not yet possible to create Unix-only users. This will be
> changed in future versions.
This reminds me. It has a serious lack of error correction prob
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 02:09:32PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> At the moment all user accounts have an objectClass samba(Sam)Account
> and it is not yet possible to create Unix-only users. This will be
> changed in future versions.
This reminds me. It has a serious lack of error correction prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig Small wrote:
| On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
| Unpacking ldap-account-manager (from ldap-account-manager_0.3-1_all.deb)
| ...
| Setting up ldap-account-manager (0.3-1) ...
| chown: failed to get attributes of `/e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig Small wrote:
| On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
| Unpacking ldap-account-manager (from ldap-account-manager_0.3-1_all.deb)
| ...
| Setting up ldap-account-manager (0.3-1) ...
| chown: failed to get attributes of `/etc
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor to upload my packages. The package will be
> maintained by myself and I already submitted an ITP bug (#208406).
> So I need a sponsor for checking the package and uploading it.
>
> LAM is a tool to manage S
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor to upload my packages. The package will be
> maintained by myself and I already submitted an ITP bug (#208406).
> So I need a sponsor for checking the package and uploading it.
>
> LAM is a tool to manage S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Keith Dunwoody wrote:
| I think there's already a lam source package in the archive (which
| builds the lam3 binary package, among others), and has been a lam binary
| package in the past, so you might have to pick a different name. LAM in
| thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Keith Dunwoody wrote:
| I think there's already a lam source package in the archive (which
| builds the lam3 binary package, among others), and has been a lam binary
| package in the past, so you might have to pick a different name. LAM in
| this
Hi,
I think there's already a lam source package in the archive (which builds the
lam3 binary package, among others), and has been a lam binary package in the
past, so you might have to pick a different name. LAM in this case standing
for Local Area Multicomputer.
-- Keith
P.S. IANADD and
Hi,
I think there's already a lam source package in the archive (which builds the
lam3 binary package, among others), and has been a lam binary package in the
past, so you might have to pick a different name. LAM in this case standing
for Local Area Multicomputer.
-- Keith
P.S. IANADD and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
thanks to Andreas Barth and Artur R. Czechowski for their explanations
about the packet system.
I am looking for a sponsor to upload my packages. The package will be
maintained by myself and I already submitted an ITP bug (#208406).
So I nee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
thanks to Andreas Barth and Artur R. Czechowski for their explanations
about the packet system.
I am looking for a sponsor to upload my packages. The package will be
maintained by myself and I already submitted an ITP bug (#208406).
So I need a
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:23:23PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> This ITP-bug seems to be for maintainers, I am a developer of LAM but I
> am no Debian maintainer and also did not plan to become one.
> I am just looking for an existing Debian maintainer who checks my
> package for policy violations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|>What is an ITP bug? I read some of the new maintainers manual but I am
|>not really familiar with the process of pushing packages into Debian.
|
| New Maintainers' Guide gives you a hint in chapter 2 section 1:
| Choose your program[1].
| However pa
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:23:23PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> This ITP-bug seems to be for maintainers, I am a developer of LAM but I
> am no Debian maintainer and also did not plan to become one.
> I am just looking for an existing Debian maintainer who checks my
> package for policy violations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|>What is an ITP bug? I read some of the new maintainers manual but I am
|>not really familiar with the process of pushing packages into Debian.
|
| New Maintainers' Guide gives you a hint in chapter 2 section 1:
| Choose your program[1].
| However pack
Hello Roland,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:24:13PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> What is an ITP bug? I read some of the new maintainers manual but I am
> not really familiar with the process of pushing packages into Debian.
New Maintainers' Guide gives you a hint in chapter 2 section 1:
Choose your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| * Roland Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-01 18:53]:
| | the LDAP Account Manager (LAM) team is looking for a sponsor.
| |
| | LAM is a tool to manage Samba and Unix accounts in (Open)LDAP. It is
| | written in PHP4 and shoul
Hello Roland,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:24:13PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> What is an ITP bug? I read some of the new maintainers manual but I am
> not really familiar with the process of pushing packages into Debian.
New Maintainers' Guide gives you a hint in chapter 2 section 1:
Choose your
* Roland Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-01 18:53]:
| the LDAP Account Manager (LAM) team is looking for a sponsor.
|
| LAM is a tool to manage Samba and Unix accounts in (Open)LDAP. It is
| written in PHP4 and should run on all architectures.
interesting.
|
| Debian package: Homepage or
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the LDAP Account Manager (LAM) team is looking for a sponsor.
LAM is a tool to manage Samba and Unix accounts in (Open)LDAP. It is
written in PHP4 and should run on all architectures.
Features:
- - management of Unix user and group accounts (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Sauter wrote:
| * Roland Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-01 18:53]:
| | the LDAP Account Manager (LAM) team is looking for a sponsor.
| |
| | LAM is a tool to manage Samba and Unix accounts in (Open)LDAP. It is
| | written in PHP4 and sho
* Roland Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-01 18:53]:
| the LDAP Account Manager (LAM) team is looking for a sponsor.
|
| LAM is a tool to manage Samba and Unix accounts in (Open)LDAP. It is
| written in PHP4 and should run on all architectures.
interesting.
|
| Debian package: Homepage or
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
the LDAP Account Manager (LAM) team is looking for a sponsor.
LAM is a tool to manage Samba and Unix accounts in (Open)LDAP. It is
written in PHP4 and should run on all architectures.
Features:
- - management of Unix user and group account
34 matches
Mail list logo
