On 02/07/07, Richard A. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 02 July 2007 18:41:01 you wrote:
[snip]
| No, I didn't remove/replace any single file. I would hope a
| DD/somebody to tell me I should remove/replace any file if required
| and why.
| All the icons were released under LGPL, so
On Monday 02 July 2007 18:41:01 you wrote:
[snip]
| No, I didn't remove/replace any single file. I would hope a
| DD/somebody to tell me I should remove/replace any file if required
| and why.
| All the icons were released under LGPL, so there's no licence problem
| I'm aware of.
The license issue
Hello Richard,
On 02/07/07, Richard A. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just wondered if you replaced the Linspire animated logo from Konqueror?
This and some other licensing things are keeping me from doing this package
for Kubuntu at this time.
No, I didn't remove/replace any single file
I just wondered if you replaced the Linspire animated logo from Konqueror?
This and some other licensing things are keeping me from doing this package
for Kubuntu at this time.
--
Richard A. Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key: 0x2E2C0124
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On 02/07/07, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/3/07, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I'll use the latter (uploading to mentors right now).
> By the way, are you interested in sponsoring the package? =)
I'm not a KDE user and I don't have time for sponsoring, sorry.
On 7/3/07, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, I'll use the latter (uploading to mentors right now).
By the way, are you interested in sponsoring the package? =)
I'm not a KDE user and I don't have time for sponsoring, sorry.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
On 01/07/07, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/28/07, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using a datestamp because that seems to be the best way to handle
> the 'version' of the icons pack.
To prevent the need for an epoch if upstream decides to use versions,
you might wa
On 6/28/07, Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using a datestamp because that seems to be the best way to handle
the 'version' of the icons pack.
To prevent the need for an epoch if upstream decides to use versions,
you might want to go with something like 0.0.20070625-1 or
0.0.20
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kde-icons-crystalproject".
* Package name: kde-icons-crystalproject
Version : 20070625-1
Upstream Author : Everaldo Coelho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.everaldo.com/crystal/
* License : LGPL
Sec
9 matches
Mail list logo