Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-31 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:19:49AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:46, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:09:18AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > >> I have updated (and shortened) the rules file to use the dh7 features. > >> It has been uploaded on m.

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-31 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 08:46, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:09:18AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: >> I have updated (and shortened) the rules file to use the dh7 features. >> It has been uploaded on m.d.n [1]. > > Good! :) > > There is one issue, though: By using ./configure

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 01:09:18AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > I have updated (and shortened) the rules file to use the dh7 features. > It has been uploaded on m.d.n [1]. Good! :) There is one issue, though: By using ./configure directly you pass away the chance of working with DEB_*_GNU_TYP

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:03, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:26:53AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: >> >> > I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why >> > don't you use dh7 style debian/

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:05:09 +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > >> autotools-dev has debhelper helpers/addons since 20100122.1, so > >> "dh --with autotools_dev $@" (and an appropriate versioned build dep) > >> should be enough. > > Wow, never saw that. Thanks for mentioning! It's rather new, and I

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:03, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:26:53AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: >> >> > I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why >> > don't you use dh7 style debian/

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:26:53AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why > > don't you use dh7 style debian/rules? I mean, you don't have to, but you > > can avoid the

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread gregor herrmann
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:30:31 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > I'm sorry, I didn't catch that earlier. But since we're still at it: why > don't you use dh7 style debian/rules? I mean, you don't have to, but you > can avoid the whole DEB_*_GNU_TYPE stuff and shorten your rules file to > a few lines. #

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:37:46AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > I have added a README.debian explaining the directory changes, and the > way to configure iptotal with apache2. > > (I also modified the README.source file to state quilt instead of dpatch.) Yeah, about that... you're using 3.0 (

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-30 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:42:14AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > > *Any* package installing files into /var/www violates FHS/policy as > > that's the web root for the system admin, not the maintainer. Thus the > > changes in the package here

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > *Any* package installing files into /var/www violates FHS/policy as > that's the web root for the system admin, not the maintainer. Thus the > changes in the package here and the moving around of old files in > postinst. Somewhere under /s

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hello Hauke, On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 18:42, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > Hi Ignace, > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:19:23PM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:55, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: >> > I'm not convinced your fix is the best way to go. Is iptotal unusable >> > with apache

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 07:18:36PM +0200, Mats Erik Andersson wrote: > A quick hint below. As I have not got the complete picture, do bare > with me if I misunderstood the remark. > > måndag den 29 mars 2010 klockan 18:42 skrev Jan Hauke Rahm detta: > > Hi Ignace, > > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Mats Erik Andersson
A quick hint below. As I have not got the complete picture, do bare with me if I misunderstood the remark. måndag den 29 mars 2010 klockan 18:42 skrev Jan Hauke Rahm detta: > Hi Ignace, > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:19:23PM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:55, Jan Ha

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
Hi Ignace, On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 06:19:23PM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:55, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > I'm not convinced your fix is the best way to go. Is iptotal unusable > > with apache2? I thought it would be better to support apache2 and > > perform better ch

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hello Hauke, On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:55, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:09:28AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-12 >> of my package "iptotal". >> >> It builds these binary packages: >> iptotal    - m

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:09:28AM +0200, Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-12 > of my package "iptotal". > > It builds these binary packages: > iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP > > The package appears to be li

RFS: iptotal (updated package) (2nd try)

2010-03-29 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-12 of my package "iptotal". It builds these binary packages: iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 572246 (grave), 574121 (important) T

RFS: iptotal (updated package)

2010-03-02 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-12 of my package "iptotal". It builds these binary packages: iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 572246 (grave). [1] The package can

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ignace Mouzannar schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-11 of my package > "iptotal". > > It builds these binary packages: > iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP > > The package appears

RFS: iptotal (updated package)

2009-11-25 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-11 of my package "iptotal". It builds these binary packages: iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 557972 (serious) The package can be

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package)

2009-11-20 Thread Barry deFreese
Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-10 of my package > "iptotal". > > The package was converted to the "3.0 (quilt)" packaging format. > > It builds these binary packages: > iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP > >

RFS: iptotal (updated package)

2009-11-20 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-10 of my package "iptotal". The package was converted to the "3.0 (quilt)" packaging format. It builds these binary packages: iptotal- monitor for IP traffic, not requiring SNMP The package appears to be lintian clean (excep

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package, adopting)

2009-11-15 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 01:31, Barry deFreese wrote: (...) > Ignore that last e-mail, uploaded. Thanks! > > Barry deFreese > I was about to reply :) Thank you very much for uploading my package. Regards, Ignace M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package, adopting)

2009-11-15 Thread Barry deFreese
Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > Hi Barry, > > Thank you for reviewing my package. > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 23:57, Barry deFreese wrote: >> Hi Ignace, >> >> Seems to be one issue (and one minor). >> >> bdefre...@bddebian3:~/debian/iptotal$ lintian -I >> /home/bdefreese/pbuild-unstable/result/iptotal

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package, adopting)

2009-11-15 Thread Barry deFreese
Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > Hi Barry, > > Thank you for reviewing my package. > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 23:57, Barry deFreese wrote: >> Hi Ignace, >> >> Seems to be one issue (and one minor). >> >> bdefre...@bddebian3:~/debian/iptotal$ lintian -I >> /home/bdefreese/pbuild-unstable/result/iptotal

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package, adopting)

2009-11-15 Thread Barry deFreese
Ignace Mouzannar wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iptotal". > > * Package name: iptotal > Version : 0.3.3-9 > Upstream Author : Antoine Megens > * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/iptotal > * License : GPL-2 > Sectio

Re: RFS: iptotal (updated package, adopting)

2009-11-15 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Hi Barry, Thank you for reviewing my package. On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 23:57, Barry deFreese wrote: > Hi Ignace, > > Seems to be one issue (and one minor). > > bdefre...@bddebian3:~/debian/iptotal$ lintian -I > /home/bdefreese/pbuild-unstable/result/iptotal_0.3.3-9_i386.changes > W: iptotal: imag

RFS: iptotal (updated package, adopting)

2009-11-15 Thread Ignace Mouzannar
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iptotal". * Package name: iptotal Version : 0.3.3-9 Upstream Author : Antoine Megens * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/iptotal * License : GPL-2 Section : admin It builds these binary pa