Re: RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-03-05 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Do you know mcatalog maybe? How is griffith different from it? OK, > mcatalog is a dotNet application, which needs mono under Linux; but I > mean functionality differences. I don't see this package in Debian, but there is another similar package: gcfilms

Re: RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-03-05 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:15 +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > close your ITP with this line; also it goes to unstable and not stable. > > It is closed in line 37 (package v0.4.2+cvs20050923-1) > Should I move it to the most recent version? It is not a mus

Re: RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-03-05 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi Piotr, > > On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 18:26 +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > > Griffith 0.6 is released. I'm now searching for a sponsor for my package. > Well, it's quite right, but has problems. > I better like the 'New upstream release.' text, but what yo

Re: RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-03-05 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
Hi Piotr, On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 18:26 +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: > Griffith 0.6 is released. I'm now searching for a sponsor for my package. Well, it's quite right, but has problems. I better like the 'New upstream release.' text, but what you miss is to close your ITP with this line; also it

RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-03-05 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Hello, Griffith 0.6 is released. I'm now searching for a sponsor for my package. All files can be downloaded form here [1] or from mentors.debian.net. The ITP number is #329853 * Package name: griffith Version : 0.6 Upstream Author : Vasco Nunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL

Re: RFC/RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-02-28 Thread POX
Yaroslav Halchenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > It is lintian clean but linda returns warnings about having > > files in /usr/lib directory. Since they're python files, > > I see no problem with having them in there, am I right? > From > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-prog

Re: RFC/RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-02-24 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Vasco, My 1 cent: > It is lintian clean but linda returns warnings about having > files in /usr/lib directory. Since they're python files, > I see no problem with having them in there, am I right? From http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/python-policy/ch-programs.html " A program using

RFC/RFS: griffith -- A film collection manager

2006-02-22 Thread Piotr Ozarowski
Hello, We want to release Griffith v0.6 in about 2 weeks and I'm looking for a check of my package (and for future sponsor) It is lintian clean but linda returns warnings about having files in /usr/lib directory. Since they're python files, I see no problem with having them in there, am I right?