Control: tags -1 +confirmed
Xiyue,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your contribution
to the Debian project.
The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help package
submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages prior to
po
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":
* Package name : go-mode.el
Version : 3:1.6.0+git20240630.602d73e-1
Upstream contact : Dominik Honnef
* URL : https://github.com/dominikh/go-mod
Xiyue Deng writes:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":
>
> * Package name : go-mode.el
>Version : 3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1
>U
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":
* Package name : go-mode.el
Version : 3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1
Upstream contact : Dominik Honnef
* URL
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:32:31 -0300 "Gabriel M. Dutra"
wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-junit-report":
* Package name : go-junit-report
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : TODO
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-junit-report":
* Package name : go-junit-report
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : TODO
* URL : https://github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report
* License : Expat
* Vcs : https://salsa.debia
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:41:18 +0100
with message-id <80cc6c68-0480-0f73-bc4c-ceda794a9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.3.0-1 -- Command line utility to send
messages or files using XMPP
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008035,
regarding RFS: go-se
Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:51:00 +0100
with message-id <42e9ebed-a61f-a408-fe74-eae234eb1...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.2.0-1 -- Command line utility to send
messages or files using XMPP
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005922,
regarding RFS: go-se
Hola Ivan Wong!
El 21/03/2010 a las 16:42 escribiste:
> So sounds like more people prefer "google-go". I just renamed it and
> re-uploaded it:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
> unstable main contrib n
Ivan Wong a écrit :
So sounds like more people prefer "google-go". I just renamed it and
re-uploaded it:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/deb
So sounds like more people prefer "google-go". I just renamed it and
re-uploaded it:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google
David Baird wrote:
> I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go google-go,
> and if another implementation is ever created, it could be called
> something-else-go.
or as short version: "ggo"
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dominique Dumont
wrote:
> How about naming this package go-compiler ?
>
> This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a
> computer language is implicit.
I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go google-go,
and if another i
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:09:17AM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> How about naming this package go-compiler ?
>
> This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a
> computer language is implicit.
The problem with not tying it to Google is when someone decides to
package
Il giorno ven, 19/03/2010 alle 10.08 +0100, Adam Borowski ha scritto:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
> > > * Package name: go
>
> > > It builds these binary packages:
> > > go - Google's Go pro
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
> > * Package name: go
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > go - Google's Go programming language compiler
>
> Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My fi
On Thursday 18 March 2010 16:50:03 Brian Nelson wrote:
> '-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
> (e.g. texlive-lang-*). I actually prefer the "google-go" suggestion
> since I think that's the least ambiguous.
Good point.
Going back to the package description, I s
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Brian Nelson wrote:
>> Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
>> like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
>> golang? Any other suggestions?
>
> '-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languag
Ivan Wong writes:
> Hi Dominique,
>
> Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
> like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
> golang? Any other suggestions?
'-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
(e.g. texlive-lang-
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010, Ivan Wong a écrit :
> Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
> like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
> golang? Any other suggestions?
go-lang, for me. golang gives the impression that it is a software
called Golang.
--
Hi Dominique,
Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
-Ivan.
Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
>> * Package name: go
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks very much for letting me know about the problem. I have just
fixed it.
Thanks,
-Ivan.
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Just FYI:
>
> dh_strip -X"usr/lib/go/pkg" -Xgoinstall -Xgodoc -Xgoyacc -Xhgpatch
> -Xcgo -Xebnflint -Xgofmt
> strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.not
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 18. März 2010, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the
> venerable go game.
Me too. I didnt notice until your mail
> May be this package should be named google-go or better go-lang (inspired
> from the web site
On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
> * Package name: go
> Version : 2010.03.15-1
> Upstream Author : Google
> * URL : http://golang.org/
> * License : BSD Style
> Section : devel
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> go - Goog
Just FYI:
dh_strip -X"usr/lib/go/pkg" -Xgoinstall -Xgodoc -Xgoyacc -Xhgpatch
-Xcgo -Xebnflint -Xgofmt
strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note
--strip-unneeded
/tmp/go-2010.03.15/debian/go/usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_386/libcgo.so
strip: '/tmp/go-2010.03.15/debian/go/usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_38
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ivan Wong wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go".
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go/go_2010.03.15-1.dsc
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your work. I was looking at 'go' from long time and
wondering when it will come to Debian.
How about for
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go".
* Package name: go
Version : 2010.03.15-1
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://golang.org/
* License : BSD Style
Section : devel
It builds these binary packages:
go - Google's G
27 matches
Mail list logo
