Re: Linking with --as-needed in Debian Packages (Was: Re: RFS: flamerobin (updated package))

2006-10-30 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Richard Laager] > If I follow those steps, I'm making a bunch of changes in the source > directory of the package, which creates a big diff [1]. Is that > really the best way? Should I instead run those commands as part of > the package build process? I do this stuff at build time.[1] Many peop

Re: Linking with --as-needed in Debian Packages (Was: Re: RFS: flamerobin (updated package))

2006-10-30 Thread Richard Laager
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 19:30 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html > > In short: > - First try the relibtoolize approach. I'll start by admitting I don't know much about the autotools. I took a look at this URL: http://people.debian.org/

Re: Linking with --as-needed in Debian Packages (Was: Re: RFS: flamerobin (updated package))

2006-10-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:07:52PM -0600, Richard Laager wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 14:31 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > >* Added --as-needed to LDFLAGS to avoid unnecessary NEEDED entries. > > Thanks to Christian 'Greek0' Aichinger. > Is the use of --as-needed encouraged/discouraged i

Re: Linking with --as-needed in Debian Packages (Was: Re: RFS: flamerobin (updated package))

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Biebl
Richard Laager wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 14:31 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >>* Added --as-needed to LDFLAGS to avoid unnecessary NEEDED entries. >> Thanks to Christian 'Greek0' Aichinger. > > Is the use of --as-needed encouraged/discouraged in Debian? Is there a > reason this isn't u

Linking with --as-needed in Debian Packages (Was: Re: RFS: flamerobin (updated package))

2006-10-30 Thread Richard Laager
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 14:31 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >* Added --as-needed to LDFLAGS to avoid unnecessary NEEDED entries. > Thanks to Christian 'Greek0' Aichinger. Is the use of --as-needed encouraged/discouraged in Debian? Is there a reason this isn't used system-wide? (I'm aware some

Re: RFS: flamerobin (updated package)

2006-10-30 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Damyan Ivanov -- 30.10.2006 14:31 --: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.5-2 > > of my package "flamerobin". Now that's what I call "quick"! abi just uploaded it. Thanks. dam -- Damyan Ivanov Modular Software Systems [

RFS: flamerobin (updated package)

2006-10-30 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.5-2 of my package "flamerobin". It builds these binary packages: flamerobin - graphical database administration tool for Firebird DBMS The package is lintian/linda clean. Changelog: flamerobin (0.7.5-2) unstable; urgency=low

Re: [RFS] flamerobin - graphical database administration tool for Firebird DBMS (new)

2006-08-15 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:46 +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flamerobin". > > This is my second call, first (a week ago)[1] resulted in some > comments (thanks Thijs, Kari, Justin), all resolved. Uploaded. Thijs signature.asc Descript

[RFS] flamerobin - graphical database administration tool for Firebird DBMS (new)

2006-06-20 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flamerobin". This is my second call, first (a week ago)[1] resulted in some comments (thanks Thijs, Kari, Justin), all resolved. * Package name: flamerobin Version : 0.7.2-7 Upstream authors: The Flamerobin Development Team

Re: RFS: flamerobin

2006-06-14 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Kari Pahula wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:50:19PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: >> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >>> * debian/control: Architecture is set to "i386 amd64". What prevents >>> the package from being usable on other architectures? Are you sure >>> you don't mean "any"? >> flamerobin d

Re: RFS: flamerobin

2006-06-13 Thread Kari Pahula
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 06:50:19PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > * debian/control: Architecture is set to "i386 amd64". What prevents > > the package from being usable on other architectures? Are you sure > > you don't mean "any"? > > flamerobin depends on libfbclien

Re: RFS: flamerobin

2006-06-13 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Hello Damyan, > >> I am looking for a sponsor for flamerobin - а graphical database >> administration tool for Firebird DBMS. (ITP# 334489) > > I can't sponsor you (yet), but I did review your package. Here's some > things I found. Thanks, Thijs, for your time! > * debi

Re: RFS: flamerobin

2006-06-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:57:43PM +0200, Frank S. Thomas wrote: > Hi Thijs, > > On Tuesday 13 June 2006 15:41, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > * debian/watch: some people prefer to use > > http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php instead of direct queries of sf.net. > > To quote from uscan's manpage: > >

Re: RFS: flamerobin

2006-06-13 Thread Frank S. Thomas
Hi Thijs, On Tuesday 13 June 2006 15:41, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > * debian/watch: some people prefer to use > http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php instead of direct queries of sf.net. To quote from uscan's manpage: # If your package is located on sourceforge, use one of the following

Re: RFS: flamerobin

2006-06-13 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello Damyan, > I am looking for a sponsor for flamerobin - а graphical database > administration tool for Firebird DBMS. (ITP# 334489) I can't sponsor you (yet), but I did review your package. Here's some things I found. * debian/control: Architecture is set to "i386 amd64". What prevents the

RFS: flamerobin

2006-06-13 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Hi, [I'm subscribed] I am looking for a sponsor for flamerobin - а graphical database administration tool for Firebird DBMS. (ITP# 334489) FlameRobin is a graphical database administration tool for Firebird database management system. . Its goals are: - to be lightweight (small footprint,