On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:04:11PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Alessandro Ghedini writes:
>
> >> > Is anyone interested in uploading this package?
> >> >
> >> I'm interested; it's a potentially very useful piece of software. I did
> >> a quick look at your package, and found the following i
Alessandro Ghedini writes:
>> > Is anyone interested in uploading this package?
>> >
>> I'm interested; it's a potentially very useful piece of software. I did
>> a quick look at your package, and found the following issues:
>>
>> - You seem to have repacked the upstream source:
>>
>> % cmp
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 01:56:27PM +0100, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Alessandro Ghedini writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:31:29AM -0800, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> >> * Package name: failmalloc
> >> Version : 1.0-1
> >> Upstream Author : Yoshinori K. Okuji
> >> * URL
Alessandro Ghedini writes:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:31:29AM -0800, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
>> * Package name: failmalloc
>> Version : 1.0-1
>> Upstream Author : Yoshinori K. Okuji
>> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/failmalloc
>> * License : LGPL-2+
>> Se
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:31:29AM -0800, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> * Package name: failmalloc
> Version : 1.0-1
> Upstream Author : Yoshinori K. Okuji
> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/failmalloc
> * License : LGPL-2+
> Section : devel
>
> It builds
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:09:11PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:31:54PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > Not quite correct. Lintian allows you to B-D on autotools-dev (among
> > others) to suppress this warning. Adding it to B-D makes lintian skip
> > the check entir
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:31:54PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Not quite correct. Lintian allows you to B-D on autotools-dev (among
> others) to suppress this warning. Adding it to B-D makes lintian skip
> the check entirely (yupe, I did look it up in the lintain source[1]). As
> I recall you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-04 16:40, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:21:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I thinking that devel might be a better section than utils. Particularly
>> the devel section covers "Development utilities" according
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:21:16PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I thinking that devel might be a better section than utils. Particularly
> the devel section covers "Development utilities" according to [1].
Agreed.
> Any particular reason for Build-Depending on autotools-dev? It does not
> appear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-01-04 12:31, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "failmalloc".
>
Hey
Thanks for your interest in Debian. This is indeed an interesting
library. :)
> * Package name: failmalloc
> V
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "failmalloc".
* Package name: failmalloc
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Yoshinori K. Okuji
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/failmalloc
* License : LGPL-2+
Section : utils
It builds these binary
11 matches
Mail list logo