Hi Marco,
sorry I forgot about this package. I will review it ASAP,
Best regards
Anton
2017-11-29 19:32 GMT+01:00 Marco Balmer :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut"
>
> * Package name: fadecut
> Version : 0.2.1-1
> Upstream Author : Mar
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut"
* Package name: fadecut
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Martin Gafner, Marco Balmer
* URL : https://github.com/fadecut/fadecut
* License : GPL-3.0
Section : sound
It builds t
Your message dated Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:30:45 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: fadecut/0.2.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #858538,
regarding RFS: fadecut/0.2.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Dear Marco,
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:51:18PM +0200, Marco Balmer wrote:
> Is the package quality from your view ok?
Sorry, I haven't reviewed it.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Dear Sean,
Thanks for reply.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 07:12:33PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:47:44AM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote:
> > Changes since the last upload:
> > fadecut (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > [...]
> These changes are not appropriate during the curren
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Marco,
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:47:44AM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> fadecut (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
> [...]
These changes are not appropriate during the current freeze.
If you want to upload this as-is, you will ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut"
* Package name: fadecut
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Martin Gafner, Marco Balmer
* URL : https://gi
Your message dated Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:24:36 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: fadecut/0.1.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #762012,
regarding RFS: fadecut/0.1.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut"
* Package name: fadecut
Version : 0.1.4-1
Upstream Author : Marco Balmer, Martin Gafner
* URL : https://gi
Your message dated Sun, 05 May 2013 16:22:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: fadecut/0.1.3-1 (post Wheezy RFS)
has caused the Debian Bug report #703693,
regarding RFS: fadecut/0.1.3-1 (post Wheezy RFS)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut"
* Package name: fadecut
Version : 0.1.3-1
Upstream Author : ma...@balmer.name
* URL : https://github.com/micressor/fadecut
* License : GPL-3
Sect
On 03/01/2013 07:40 AM, Marco Balmer wrote:
> Dear Anton,
>
> I've created the tarball with the following command:
>
> $ git archive --format=tar --prefix=fadecut-0.1.2/ 0.1.2 | bzip2 >
> ../fadecut_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2
I have simply downloaded a tar.gz from tags-page [1]
>
> Do I need to reques
Dear Anton,
I've created the tarball with the following command:
$ git archive --format=tar --prefix=fadecut-0.1.2/ 0.1.2 | bzip2 >
../fadecut_0.1.2.orig.tar.bz2
Do I need to request a RFS again after freeze time or will fadecut
migrated from experimental to unstable?
Thanks,
Marco
2013/2/28 A
Your message dated Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:35:52 +0100
with message-id <512fb198.1050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#701803: RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #701803,
regarding RFS: fadecut/0.1.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Hi Marco,
I have uploaded the package. But I used the "tar.gz"-tarball, which is
available on github, instead of "tar.bz2". Did you repack it yourself?
Thanks,
Anton
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Anton,
Thanks a lot for your useful notes. I've applied all of these and
uploaded the package again to mentors.
I am glad, if you can have a look again into the package:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/fadecut
https://github.com/micressor/fadecut/commit/ea470e1eaa345fc405e0d22e2ff13e
Hi Marco,
some notes on your package:
1) Target an upload to experimental instead of unstable due to a
freeze-period.
2) Changelog-entry #2, add short bug description.
3) Consider to use compat-level 9.
4) Update "Format-field" in copyright-file, DEP-5 is released.
5) dirs-file is useless.
6) Bar
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fadecut"
* Package name: fadecut
Version: 0.1.2-1
Upstream Author: Marco Balmer
* URL: https://github.com/micressor/fadecut
* License: GPL-3
Section: sound
It builds those binary packag
Le jeudi, 20 octobre 2011 17.30:40, Marco Balmer a écrit :
> Thanks Didier for checking my package. Make test (testing suite) runs not
> proper at the moment. I disabled it and re-uploaded the package:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/fadecut
Thanks; uploaded !
Cheers,
OdyX
signature.asc
De
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:42:31PM +0200, Didier Raboud wrote:
> I just built it and although it built correctly (buildlog attached), I think
> there are some things that should be changed: There are many
> mkdir: cannot create directory `/sbuild-nonexistent': Permission denied"
> those indic
Le lundi, 17 octobre 2011 16.17:32, Marco Balmer a écrit :
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package:
> * Package name: fadecut
Hi Marco, and thanks for your continuous work both upstream-wise and for the
packaging of fadecut in Debian.
> I would be glad if someone uploade
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package:
* Package name: fadecut
Version : 0.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Marco Balmer
* URL : http://github.com/micressor/fadecut
* License : GPLv2
Description : toolset to rip audiostreams, cut, fade in/out
22 matches
Mail list logo
