pkg-javascript-devel: Please review package dojo for inclusion into
Debian.
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 11:27 -0400, Jason Morawski wrote:
> Updated package has been uploaded to mentors.
>
> pkg-javascript-devel: Please review.
>
> On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 12:02 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > cool,
> > her
Updated package has been uploaded to mentors.
pkg-javascript-devel: Please review.
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 12:02 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> cool,
> here are a few notes :
> - add to debian/control#libjs-dojo-core description : This package contains
> the core Dojo project.
> - is the dojo/build.tx
On 09/05/2009 03:02 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> cool,
> here are a few notes :
> - add to debian/control#libjs-dojo-core description : This package
> contains the core Dojo project.
> - is the dojo/build.txt file needed by dojo ? if not, don't install it
> - add a README.Debian to dojox (although i don
cool,
here are a few notes :
- add to debian/control#libjs-dojo-core description : This package contains the
core Dojo project.
- is the dojo/build.txt file needed by dojo ? if not, don't install it
- add a README.Debian to dojox (although i don't know if you can define
different readme for the
Updated package has been uploaded to mentors.
This new package builds the different frameworks as separate binary
packages and moves the extraneous dojox files
to /usr/share/doc/libjs-dojo-dojox/examples/ maintaining the directory
structure.
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 23:50 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>
I think that some of these files should go
in /usr/share/doc/libjs-dojo-dojox/examples and others should be
excluded from the package.
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 23:50 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Sorry to bother, but :
>
> > find . -name *.php
> ./dojox/analytics/logger/dojoxAnalytics.php
> ./dojox/ana
Sorry to bother, but :
find . -name *.php
./dojox/analytics/logger/dojoxAnalytics.php
./dojox/analytics/logger/JSON.php
./dojox/form/resources/RecieveFile.php
./dojox/form/resources/cLOG.php
./dojox/form/resources/UploadFile.php
./dojox/resources/explore.php
./dojox/grid/compat/tests/support/da
Here's some lintian warnings you can take care easily :
W: dojo source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.3)
W: dojo source: patch-system-but-no-source-readme
Means you need to add a debian/README.source explaining why you needed a patch.
Also i understand that mtasc is needed
Updated package has been uploaded to mentors.
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:03 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> On 02/09/2009 17:46, Jason Morawski wrote:
> > You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
> > regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
> > l
Also please note that
/usr/share/javascript
will be accessible on the web server, e.g.
http://localhost/javascript
so in your debian/rules :
chmod +x
debian/jslib-dojo/usr/share/javascript/dojo/dojox/storage/buildFlashStorage.sh
might be a bad place and idea.
Regards.
Jérémy.
On 02/09/2009 1
On 02/09/2009 17:46, Jason Morawski wrote:
You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
lintian warning that was produced. Should I instead supply a lintian
override?
the trouble is the place of the
You just mixed up jslib and libjs.
There are no package name starting with jslib.
They all start with libjs :
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libjs
On 02/09/2009 17:37, Jason Morawski wrote:
The source package is named "dojo" and the binary package produced is
named "jslib-dojo". This
Jason Morawski a écrit :
> The source package is named "dojo" and the binary package produced is
> named "jslib-dojo". This follows the naming scheme used by the other
> jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
> these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblig
You are totally correct, I can't believe I overlooked that. Also, with
regards to the chmod line in rules, I mainly added that to remove the
lintian warning that was produced. Should I instead supply a lintian
override?
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 17:41 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> You just mixed up jslib
Hi,
please name your package
"libjs-dojo"
Regards,
Jérémy Lal.
On 02/09/2009 16:33, Jason Morawski wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dojo".
* Package name: dojo
Version : 1.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Alex Russell
* URL : http://dojotool
The source package is named "dojo" and the binary package produced is
named "jslib-dojo". This follows the naming scheme used by the other
jslib packages. However, if the naming policy has changed regarding
these types of packages, I will be more than happy to oblige.
Please let me know, thank you
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dojo".
* Package name: dojo
Version : 1.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Alex Russell
* URL : http://dojotoolkit.org
* License : BSD
Section : web
It builds these binary packages:
jslib-dojo - Modular
17 matches
Mail list logo
