RE: RFS: cr3

2011-02-09 Thread Vadim Lopatin
Best regards, Vadim -Original Message- From: Vadim Lopatin [mailto:bugg...@fromru.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 4:02 PM To: 'Anton Gladky' Cc: 'debian-mentors@lists.debian.org' Subject: RE: RFS: cr3 Hello, I've fixed lintinan pedantic findings, chan

Re: RFS: cr3

2011-02-08 Thread Dominik George
Hi, >> * changelog field says, that you want to upload your package to lucid, >> but you should change it to "unstable" or "experimental" (you are >> uploading to Debian, not directly yo Ubuntu) > apart from that, wouldn't lucid be just a bit outdated either ;) ? Cheers, Nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

RE: RFS: cr3

2011-02-08 Thread Vadim Lopatin
Hello Peter, Thank you, I've fixed it. Best regards, Vadim -Original Message- From: Peter Pentchev [mailto:r...@ringlet.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 1:58 PM To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: cr3 On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:59:55AM +0100, Anton G

RE: RFS: cr3

2011-02-08 Thread Vadim Lopatin
es? (not used in debian build) Best regards, Vadim -Original Message- From: Anton Gladky [mailto:gladky.an...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 10:00 AM To: bugg...@fromru.com Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: RFS: cr3 Hi, Vadim, I am not a DD, but maybe my

Re: RFS: cr3

2011-02-08 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:59:55AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi, Vadim, > > I am not a DD, but maybe my advices will help you to make your package better: I'm not a DD either, but here's just a little note: > * changelog field says, that you want to upload your package to lucid, > but you sho

RE: RFS: cr3

2011-02-07 Thread buggins
n.org Subject: Re: RFS: cr3 Hi, Vadim, I am not a DD, but maybe my advices will help you to make your package better: * it is better to create machine-readable copyright-file according to DEP-5 http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ * changelog field says, that you want to upload your package to lucid

Re: RFS: cr3

2011-02-07 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, Vadim, I am not a DD, but maybe my advices will help you to make your package better: * it is better to create machine-readable copyright-file according to DEP-5 http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ * changelog field says, that you want to upload your package to lucid, but you should change it to

RFS: cr3

2011-02-07 Thread Vadim Lopatin
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cr3". * Package name: cr3 Version : 3.0.43-11 Upstream Author : Vadim Lopatin * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/crengine/ * License : GPL2 Section : text It builds these binary packages: