Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-12-03 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:06:54PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Package uploaded. > > Please mail this list for future uploads and I will upload if I can. Excellent, cheers :-) Jonathan -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-12-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Copher is command line base rather than a GUI, is platform independent, > and works with other -forge-like sites (ex. Rubyforge) and protocols. > So I think it's not a replacement, but complimentary to releaseforge. F

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-12-02 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:16:49PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > I just noticed that releaseforge already exists in Debian. From the > description it sounds like it does the same thing as copher. Is it > still nessecary to add copher to Debian? Copher is command line base rather than a GUI, is platfor

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-12-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uploaded to > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201-1.dsc > if you have a chance to look. I just noticed that releaseforge already exists in Debian. From the description it sounds l

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-12-02 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:07:24PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > A few comments: > > Your package version does not include a Debian revision number. My bad, fixed. > I would use a phrase other than 'project management' in the > descriptions, perhaps 'release management'? > > debian/copyright: You m

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-12-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2+20081201.dsc, > if there are other points to fix just let me know. A few comments: Your package version does not include a Debian revision number. I w

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-12-01 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi Paul On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:01:43PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > It is best not to speculate about future features in the package > description, please remove the last line. > > Uhhh, Depends: is a header for binary packages, not source packages. > You put ${misc:Depends} in the wrong section

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-11-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-4.dsc More comments: It is best not to speculate about future features in the package description, please remove the last line. Uhhh, Depends: is a h

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-11-22 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Uploaded an updated package to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-4.dsc Thanks in advance for your feedback. -- Jonathan Wiltshire signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-11-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ah, this fixes a query I had from long ago: I had ${misc:Depends} in >> the build dependencies and it broke things, now that it's in Depends

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-11-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, this fixes a query I had from long ago: I had ${misc:Depends} in > the build dependencies and it broke things, now that it's in Depends > everything is as expected. build-deps > What does this substitution get e

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-11-18 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:33:35PM +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > Standards-Version doesn't need the final .0, 3.8.0.X versions are compatible. Removed the tailing .0 > Depends should have ${misc:Depends} in it. Ah, this fixes a query I had from long ago: I had ${misc:Depends} in the build dependenci

Re: RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-11-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/copher/copher_0.1.2-3.dsc A review of your source package: Standards-Version doesn't need the final .0, 3.8.0.X versions are compatible. Depends should have ${misc:Depen

RFS: copher (2nd try)

2008-11-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "copher". * Package name: copher Version : 0.1.2-3 Upstream Author : Peter Lunicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://copher.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL