Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-02 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Claudio Matsuoka wrote: > I'll review the package accoring to the Chapter 6 of the Developer's > Reference and make a new set of files available afterwards. New file set at http://tweek.dyndns.org:8080/stuff/coldfire/. Fixed the few remaining issues, passed lintian/linda and b

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > You probably also need build-depend on docbook-to-man package (for > manpage generation). Added. I also changed the Standards-Version to 3.6.2 and section to main. I'm currently setting up a pbuilder environment but it seems that debootstrap isn'

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
30 червня 2005 о 16:32 -0300 Claudio Matsuoka написав(-ла): > > 2. control file have 'Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), > > autotools-dev'. Generated .deb have 'Depends: ... libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5), > > libreadline5'. > > Are you sure you do not need other packages in Build-Depends:? > > Fixed.

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
One more thing: why you use section contrib for that package? I see that other emulators that do not require some non-free ROMs are in section 'main' (qemu, gxemul, pearpc, bochs). And see http://www.nl.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-desc-basics about ho

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Philipp Kern
On 01.07.2005, at 15:42, Justin Pryzby wrote: Anyone know of a good pseudopackage on which to clone this bug to prevent acceptance of any package with such a standards-version? Is ftp an appropriate place? You could file a wishlist bug on ``ftp.debian.org'' but I doubt that it would get impl

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Justin Pryzby
Subject: rpncalc: Standards-Version > Max-Standards_Version Package: rpncalc Severity: normal On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:23:38PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 30.06.2005, at 21:32, Claudio Matsuoka wrote: > >Changed to 3.6.2.1, which I assume it's the latest policy manual > >version. > >I noti

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-07-01 Thread Neil McGovern
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 04:32:59PM -0300, Claudio Matsuoka wrote: > Thanks for reviewing, fixed packages were uploaded to the same location > (http://tweek.dyndns.org:8080/stuff/coldfire/). Is there an automated way > to check for common errors such as missing build dependencies? > Yup :) See th

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-06-30 Thread Philipp Kern
On 30.06.2005, at 21:32, Claudio Matsuoka wrote: Changed to 3.6.2.1, which I assume it's the latest policy manual version. I noticed that rpncalc uses Standards-Version: 3.6.6. Is that correct? Lastest is "3.6.2". You do not need to list the minor patch level .1 which is for cosmetic fixes

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-06-30 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov wrote: > There are several problems with package: > > 1. package have source for manpage, but it never get installed. Fixed. > 2. control file have 'Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), > autotools-dev'. Generated .deb have 'Depends: ... libncurses5 (>=

Re: RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-06-30 Thread Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
Hi, There are several problems with package: 1. package have source for manpage, but it never get installed. 2. control file have 'Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), autotools-dev'. Generated .deb have 'Depends: ... libncurses5 (>= 5.4-5), libreadline5'. Are you sure you do not need other pack

RFS: coldfire: packages URL

2005-06-30 Thread Claudio Matsuoka
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Claudio Matsuoka wrote: > * Package name: coldfire > Version : 0.2.2 > Upstream Author : David Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.slicer.ca/coldfire/ > * License : GPL > Description : A Freescale Coldfire 5206 emulator Pa