Re: RFS: c++-annotations

2006-09-13 Thread George Danchev
Ok, FYI: that has been uploaded to NEW queue. Thanks. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Subject: RFS: c++-annotations

2006-09-07 Thread George Danchev
On Friday 08 September 2006 00:05, tony mancill wrote: > Hello George, Hello, > I'm looking at this package. Here are a couple of comments so far: Thanks for looking at the package and your comments. > debian/control: > > * The package Architecture should be "all" instead of "any" - this will

Re: Subject: RFS: c++-annotations

2006-09-07 Thread tony mancill
Hello George, I'm looking at this package. Here are a couple of comments so far: debian/control: * The package Architecture should be "all" instead of "any" - this will prevent the (identical) package from being built for every Debian architecture. * You can remove ${shlibs:Depends} from Depen

Subject: RFS: c++-annotations

2006-09-07 Thread George Danchev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "c++-annotations". * Package name: c++-annotations Version : 6.4.0f-1 Upstream Author : Frank B. Brokken * URL : ftp://ftp.rug.nl/contrib/frank/documents/annotations/ * License : GPL Section : de