Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:38:49 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time. > Uploaded. Thanks a lot! 8) -- Besos, Marga

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:38:49 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time. > Uploaded. Thanks a lot! 8) -- Besos, Marga -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time. Uploaded. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I've placed the new package at the same location. Thanks for your time. Uploaded. Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key

dpatch (was: Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned))

Margarita Manterola [u] wrote on 21/10/2004 21:26: Ok, done too. Although the dpatch black magic still puzzles me. At least dpatch doesn't require the upstream source to still be packed like dbs seems to do. That's the main reason why I simply _hate_ dbs based packages. cu, sven

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi! On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:14:25 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > The new package (source and binary) can be found at: > > http://www.gnuservers.com.ar/~marga/debian/astyle/ > > > > Please do tell me what you think of it. > You moved to using dpatch; please mention that

dpatch (was: Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned))

Margarita Manterola [u] wrote on 21/10/2004 21:26: Ok, done too. Although the dpatch black magic still puzzles me. At least dpatch doesn't require the upstream source to still be packed like dbs seems to do. That's the main reason why I simply _hate_ dbs based packages. cu, sven -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in > August. I need a sponsor to upload it. > > In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply > with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs > (3 out of 7)

RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi! I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in August. I need a sponsor to upload it. In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs (3 out of 7). The other 4 bugs seem quite hard to

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi! On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:14:25 +0200, Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > The new package (source and binary) can be found at: > > http://www.gnuservers.com.ar/~marga/debian/astyle/ > > > > Please do tell me what you think of it. > You moved to using dpatch; please mention that

Re: RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi, Margarita Manterola wrote: > I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in > August. I need a sponsor to upload it. > > In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply > with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs > (3 out of 7)

RFS: astyle (previously orphaned)

Hi! I'm making a new package for astyle, which has been orphaned in August. I need a sponsor to upload it. In the package I've made, I've updated the files so that they comply with the new policies, and I've also taken care of some fixable bugs (3 out of 7). The other 4 bugs seem quite hard to