> Quoting myself:
> > I also heard doing direct patches to the upstream source is not liked
> > and one should use quilt or dpatch. I think using Git for this task is
> > enough to keep track of the changes and also way easier. Advocates of
> > Git-based packaging (for example, Joey Hess) seem to
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:20:50PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> 1) Your diff.gz modifies files outside debian/. Some sponsors will
>require you to use a patch system like dpatch or quilt, so it might
>be easier to find a sponsor if you used a patch system.
Quoting myself:
> I also heard
On 08/04/2008, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> As far as I can see your package is perl-only, so
> [...]
> 3) Why is your package Architecture: all instead of any?
Why are you asking questions you've answered already?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpyI9lKR8lcD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arename".
1) Your diff.gz modifies files outside debian/. Some sponsors will
require you to use a patch system like dpatch or quilt, so it might
be easier to find a sponsor if you used a patch system.
As far as I can see your package is perl-only
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arename".
* Package name: arename
* Version : 1.6
* Upstream Author : Frank Terbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ft.bewatermyfriend.org/comp/arename.html
* License : 2-clause BSD license
* Section
5 matches
Mail list logo