On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a QA upload for eterm-themes with basically just updating the
> maintainer to QA Group, bump standards, etc.
Perhaps the pkg-e team would like to take it? Or request its removal
or something? Anyone contacted
On 29/03/2008, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> First, was the debhelper compatibility upgrade necessary? I think
> leaving it at level 4 makes backporting easier.
$ rmadison debhelper
debhelper | 4.2.32 | oldstable | source, all
debhelper | 5.0.42 | etch-m68k | source, all
debhelper
Hi Barry,
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 11:46 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> There is still a lintian warning about the copyright because there are
> not dates but I really don't want to dig through all the tarballs.
According to debian/copyright and debian/changelog , it's around since
2002 march/april
3 matches
Mail list logo
