Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package) (Second try)

2011-02-07 Thread Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2011-02-06 21:40, Daniel Echeverry wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-5 > of my package "9menu". > > It builds these binary packages: > 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell > > The package appea

RFS: 9menu (updated package) (Second try)

2011-02-06 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-5 of my package "9menu". It builds these binary packages: 9menu      - Creates X menus from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian

RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-12-16 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-5 of my package "9menu". It builds these binary packages: 9menu      - Creates X menus from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)

2010-11-19 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Daniel Echeverry writes: > OK, remove the 9menu.docs. Please check out again: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/9/9menu/9menu_1.8-4.dsc Uploaded with one minor change (chmod -x debian/{patches,format}/*; somehow this sneaked in with the last upload). Thanks for your work :-) Regards

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)

2010-11-19 Thread Daniel Echeverry
On 19/11/10 15:29, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: Hi, · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? If not, it should not be installed. I think that the README file is very important in any package, the

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)

2010-11-19 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, >> · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is >> not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? >> If not, it should not be installed. > > I think that the README file is very important in any package, the > README file has important descript

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)

2010-11-14 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi! · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? If not, it should not be installed. I think that the README file is very important in any package, the README file has important descriptive informa

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)

2010-11-14 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, epsilon writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-4 > of my package "9menu". Some comments: · Does the README provide any information relevant to the user that is not already provided elsewhere (e.g. in the copyright file)? If not, it should not be installed. · Th

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)

2010-11-13 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi, epsilon wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-4 > of my package "9menu". > > It builds these binary packages: > 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell You can further simplify your debian/rules file by letting debhelper know what to do through files in debian/ inst

RFS: 9menu (updated package, Second try)

2010-11-12 Thread epsilon
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-4 of my package "9menu". It builds these binary packages: 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-11-06 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi Three things you might want to correct in the next upload: · debian/rules: The override_dh_auto_clean target is not necessary as it just calls dh_auto_clean with no options. Done! · debian/rules: You should remove the generated upstream changelog in the clean target. For examp

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-11-01 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Daniel Echeverry writes: >> I did take a look at your package. Some comments: >> >> · debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line. > I am a bit confused, I don't understand this You wrote +Change all patches from quilt instead of + Change all patches from quilt in

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-10-31 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Hi I did take a look at your package. Some comments: · debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line. I am a bit confused, I don't understand this · debian/compat: You build-depend on debhelper 7, but use compat level 5. Is that intentional? · debian/rules: - dh_a

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-10-30 Thread Daniel Echeverry
El 30/10/10 04:31, Ansgar Burchardt escribió: Hi, Daniel Echeverry writes: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-3 of my package "9menu". I did take a look at your package. Some comments: · debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line. · debian/compat: You bu

Re: RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-10-30 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Daniel Echeverry writes: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-3 of my package > "9menu". I did take a look at your package. Some comments: · debian/changelog: There is a space missing in the last line. · debian/compat: You build-depend on debhelper 7, but use compat le

RFS: 9menu (updated package)

2010-10-24 Thread Daniel Echeverry
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8-3 of my package "9menu". It builds these binary packages: 9menu - Creates X menus from the shell The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 525488 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: -