Le samedi 06 mai 2006 à 07:16 -0500, Carlo Segre a écrit :
> On Fri, 5 May 2006, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually, if I stay with the one-package-per-plugin approach, I was
> > thinking of providing a virtual package that would pull out yorick and
> > all the plugins (except perhaps the m
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
Actually, if I stay with the one-package-per-plugin approach, I was
thinking of providing a virtual package that would pull out yorick and
all the plugins (except perhaps the most specialised). Would that make
sense? In that case, I also need to think
Sorry for the personal answer Thijs, this was meant to go to the list.
__
Hello Thijs,
Thanks for your answer.
Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 17:25 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
[...]
> > * package granularity: I have currently 7 add-on packages (one more
> > coming soon), each one
Sorry for the personal answer Thijs, this was meant to go to the list.
__
Hello Thijs,
Thanks for your answer.
Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 17:25 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
[...]
> > * package granularity: I have currently 7 add-on packages (one more
> > coming soon), each one
Hello Thibaut,
> I know the packages need more work (in particular concerning the
> copyright files, removing commented-out dh_*lines in rules and
> rebuilding under sid), so I am not requesting a detailed review, but I
> think advice on the following few questions would be timely:
That's always
Hello,
I am adopting Yorick and packaging add-ons for this interpreted language
aimed at scientific number crunching, data visualisation etc.
I know the packages need more work (in particular concerning the
copyright files, removing commented-out dh_*lines in rules and
rebuilding under sid), so I
6 matches
Mail list logo
