Re: RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-26 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:03:00AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: RB>> I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the RB>> format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. MP> Not a bad idea, on the whole. Feel like writing this up in a MP> webpage somewhere, sort of a "R

Re: RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-26 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:03:00AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: RB>> I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the RB>> format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. MP> Not a bad idea, on the whole. Feel like writing this up in a MP> webpage somewhere, sort of a "R

Re: RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-25 Thread Matthew Palmer
On 24 Nov 2002, Rob Bradford wrote: > I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the > format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. Not a bad idea, on the whole. Feel like writing this up in a webpage somewhere, sort of a "Requesting Sponsorship HOWTO". That way, any

Re: RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-25 Thread Matthew Palmer
On 24 Nov 2002, Rob Bradford wrote: > I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the > format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. Not a bad idea, on the whole. Feel like writing this up in a webpage somewhere, sort of a "Requesting Sponsorship HOWTO". That way, any

RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-24 Thread Rob Bradford
I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. I'm thinking something along the lines of the ITP format with the subject as "RFS: - description" And in the body several pseudo-headers, containing information such as a long

RFC: Sponsor request convention

2002-11-24 Thread Rob Bradford
I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the format of messages requesting sponsors for packages. I'm thinking something along the lines of the ITP format with the subject as "RFS: - description" And in the body several pseudo-headers, containing information such as a long