Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >> On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: >> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) >> > >> > However, Lintian throws up on me for: >> > >> > E: mailutils-imap

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: > > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) > > > > However, Lintian throws up on me for: > > > > E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmail

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:18:27PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils > creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to > tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. > > In my control fil

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >> On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: >> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) >> > >> > However, Lintian throws up on me for: >> > >> > E: mailutils-ima

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:14:30AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: > > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) > > > > However, Lintian throws up on me for: > > > > E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmai

RE: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils > creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to > tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. > > In my control file I have: > > Depends: ${s

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:18:27PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils > creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to > tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. > > In my control fi

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils > creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to > tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. > > In my control file I have: > > Depen

RE: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 14-Jul-2002 Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils > creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to > tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. > > In my control file I have: > > Depends: ${

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I'm having some trouble I can't seem to find the answer to. Mailutils > creates both 'mailutils-pop3d', and 'libmailutils0'. The two need to > tightly depend on one another, since the ABI hasn't stabilized yet. > > In my control file I have: > > Depe

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my control file I have: > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) > However, Lintian throws up on me for: > E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, > libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1) This sounds

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-14 Thread John Belmonte
Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm new to this also but... E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1) The generate mailutils.pop3d-substvars has: The error is for mailutils-imap4d, but you are looking at the config for mailutils.pop3d? Wha

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-13 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In my control file I have: > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, netbase, libmailutils0 (= ${Source-Version}) > However, Lintian throws up on me for: > E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, > libmailutils0 (= 20020713-1) This sound

Re: Tight versions depends

2002-07-13 Thread John Belmonte
Jeff Bailey wrote: Hi, I'm new to this also but... > E: mailutils-imap4d: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libmailutils0, libmailutils0 >(= 20020713-1) > > The generate mailutils.pop3d-substvars has: The error is for mailutils-imap4d, but you are looking at the config for mailutils.pop3d?