Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-07-30 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Daniel, Am 30.07.2011 um 12:56 schrieb Daniel de Kok : > Thanks for the feedback! One question: > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: >> Apart from that I only would prefer to have a -1 without a patch for the >> initial upload so that I won't have to "repackage" your up

Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-07-30 Thread Daniel de Kok
Hi Killian, Thanks for the feedback! One question: On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Kilian Krause wrote: > Apart from that I only would prefer to have a -1 without a patch for the > initial upload so that I won't have to "repackage" your upload to make it > fit for putting into the archive. Wi

Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-07-29 Thread Kilian Krause
Hi Daniel, On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:49:27AM +0200, Daniel de Kok wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Daniel de Kok wrote: > > 2011/6/24 Lars Buitinck : > >> 2011/6/24 Michael Tautschnig : > >>> Well, after a long while I got around to review this package. Here are my > >>> observations: >

Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-07-28 Thread Daniel de Kok
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Daniel de Kok wrote: > 2011/6/24 Lars Buitinck : >> 2011/6/24 Michael Tautschnig : >>> Well, after a long while I got around to review this package. Here are my >>> observations: >>> >>> - debian/README.source isn't actually helpful... >>> - There is no libdb4.8++-

Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-07-24 Thread Daniel de Kok
Dear Michael, 2011/6/24 Lars Buitinck : > 2011/6/24 Michael Tautschnig : >> Well, after a long while I got around to review this package. Here are my >> observations: >> >> - debian/README.source isn't actually helpful... >> - There is no libdb4.8++-dev in sid. It's libdb5.1++-dev now. >> - Having

Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-06-24 Thread Lars Buitinck
2011/6/24 Michael Tautschnig : > Well, after a long while I got around to review this package. Here are my > observations: > > - debian/README.source isn't actually helpful... > - There is no libdb4.8++-dev in sid. It's libdb5.1++-dev now. > - Having installed that, configure fails nevertheless: >

Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-06-24 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, > Hi everyone, > > 2011/3/5 Lars Buitinck : > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dbxml". > > It builds these binary packages: > > dbxml-doc  - Oracle Berkeley DB XML [HTML documentation] > > dbxml-util - Oracle Berkeley DB XML utilities > > libdbxml-2.5 - Oracl

Re: RFS: dbxml

2011-03-14 Thread Lars Buitinck
Hi everyone, 2011/3/5 Lars Buitinck : > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dbxml". > It builds these binary packages: > dbxml-doc  - Oracle Berkeley DB XML [HTML documentation] > dbxml-util - Oracle Berkeley DB XML utilities > libdbxml-2.5 - Oracle Berkeley DB XML librari

RE: RFS: dbxml

2011-01-12 Thread Jeroen Koekkoek
an-mentors@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: RFS: dbxml > > Dear all, dear Michael, dear Jeroen, > > I also spotted the errors in Jeroen's packaging of dbxml and have set > out to correct them, as I too would like to see DB XML packaged for > Debian and Ubuntu. When I fini

Re: RFS: dbxml

2010-12-19 Thread Lars Buitinck
Dear all, dear Michael, dear Jeroen, I also spotted the errors in Jeroen's packaging of dbxml and have set out to correct them, as I too would like to see DB XML packaged for Debian and Ubuntu. When I finish this, should I submit a new package, or can I send patches/files somewhere? Regards, Lars

Re: RFS: dbxml

2010-11-13 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Jeroen, > Dear Mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dbxml". > > * Package name: dbxml > Version : 2.5.16-1 > Upstream Author : Oracle > * URL : > http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/db/index.html > * License :