Replying to my own mail yesterday (again)
no-traffic-bug which caused no-graphing-possible ("skipping current
run") fixed...
(My suspicion than something more was broken was probably just because I
was in a hurry and didn't notice that I've configured the subnet wrong.)
Will submit this to th
Replying to my own mail yesterday (again)
no-traffic-bug which caused no-graphing-possible ("skipping current
run") fixed...
(My suspicion than something more was broken was probably just because I
was in a hurry and didn't notice that I've configured the subnet wrong.)
Will submit this to th
Replying to my own mail yesterday
David: Please don't merge the patches I've sent you.
I've looked into the "skipping current run" problem this morning.
I haven't found the root cause but here are my conclusions so far...
Affected:
bandwidthd-1.2.1b-13 (debian package)
bandwidthd-1.2.1b + al
Replying to my own mail yesterday
David: Please don't merge the patches I've sent you.
I've looked into the "skipping current run" problem this morning.
I haven't found the root cause but here are my conclusions so far...
Affected:
bandwidthd-1.2.1b-13 (debian package)
bandwidthd-1.2.1b + al
Hi Eduard!
... and David, which I think might be interested in the "bandwidthd skips
graphing bug" part right below.
Eduard, sorry for not spotting your mail sooner...
I'm not subscribed to debian-mentors and forgot to mention that I want
to be CCed.
For anyone interested in reading Eduards in
Hi Eduard!
... and David, which I think might be interested in the "bandwidthd skips
graphing bug" part right below.
Eduard, sorry for not spotting your mail sooner...
I'm not subscribed to debian-mentors and forgot to mention that I want
to be CCed.
For anyone interested in reading Eduards in
"Andreas Henriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As you see there's not really much flexibility in bandwidthd today. On
> the other hand thats probably why so many people like it. Flexible
> graphs can be created with mrtg/rrd-tool/scripts or whatever
> combination. The problem with that is j
"Andreas Henriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw. If you are good at debconf and have a minute over to help me find
> out why the "config" script isn't getting triggered even though I've
> tried dh_installdebconf and manually copying the script and templates
> to tmp/DEBIAN/ please yell! :
Hi Goswin!
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev den Thu,
08 Jul 2004 15:29:11 +0200:
Nice one. I would like to see this included.
Me too... ;)
I also have some feature suggestions (if its not yet possible):
Great!
Unfortunately bandwidthd isn't very configurable, which on the
> > Example output available at http://fjortis.info/bandwidthd/.
> >...
> > Any suggestions, comments, flames welcome!
>
> Nice one. I would like to see this included.
Ack. I would like to sponsor it but it does not work for me!
I see only this messages repeating every minute:
Previouse graphin
"Andreas Henriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As you see there's not really much flexibility in bandwidthd today. On
> the other hand thats probably why so many people like it. Flexible
> graphs can be created with mrtg/rrd-tool/scripts or whatever
> combination. The problem with that is j
Andreas Henriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor to my bandwidthd package.
>
> BandwidthD tracks traffic on the local network. It uses libpcap to
> dissect the traffic and libgd to draw graphs (optional). Capable of
> logging traffic to CDF (optional), r
"Andreas Henriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw. If you are good at debconf and have a minute over to help me find
> out why the "config" script isn't getting triggered even though I've
> tried dh_installdebconf and manually copying the script and templates
> to tmp/DEBIAN/ please yell! :
Hi Goswin!
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev den Thu,
08 Jul 2004 15:29:11 +0200:
Nice one. I would like to see this included.
Me too... ;)
I also have some feature suggestions (if its not yet possible):
Great!
Unfortunately bandwidthd isn't very configurable, which on the other hand
> > Example output available at http://fjortis.info/bandwidthd/.
> >...
> > Any suggestions, comments, flames welcome!
>
> Nice one. I would like to see this included.
Ack. I would like to sponsor it but it does not work for me!
I see only this messages repeating every minute:
Previouse graphin
Andreas Henriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everybody!
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor to my bandwidthd package.
>
> BandwidthD tracks traffic on the local network. It uses libpcap to
> dissect the traffic and libgd to draw graphs (optional). Capable of
> logging traffic to CDF (optional), r
16 matches
Mail list logo
