Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-08 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
Quoting Chewie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010207 07:50]: > They are not yet apt-get'able, as I have not taken the time to figure > out scanpackages and scansources. That's coming soon though. > cvs-buildpackage is a beautiful thing! ;-) Any suggestions, pointers, > flames are fully welcome. ;-) I hav

Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-08 Thread Stefan Alfredsson
Quoting Chewie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010207 07:50]: > They are not yet apt-get'able, as I have not taken the time to figure > out scanpackages and scansources. That's coming soon though. > cvs-buildpackage is a beautiful thing! ;-) Any suggestions, pointers, > flames are fully welcome. ;-) I ha

Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Chewie
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:07:08PM -0600, Chewie wrote: > Updated and ready: http://www.wookimus.net/debian Candidate package gtimer-1.1.5-1 (source, i386) is now apt-get'able deb http://www.wookimus.net/debian/ ./ deb-src http://www.wookimus.net/debian/ ./ -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Chewie
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 02:07:08PM -0600, Chewie wrote: > Updated and ready: http://www.wookimus.net/debian Candidate package gtimer-1.1.5-1 (source, i386) is now apt-get'able deb http://www.wookimus.net/debian/ ./ deb-src http://www.wookimus.net/debian/ ./ -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PRO

Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Chewie
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:31:37AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > try running lintian on your packages: > > W: gtimer source: newer-standards-version 3.5.0 > E: gtimer: copyright-refers-to-old-directory Updated and ready: http://www.wookimus.net/debian Source: gtimer Binary: gtimer Architec

Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Chewie
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:31:37AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > W: gtimer source: newer-standards-version 3.5.0 > E: gtimer: copyright-refers-to-old-directory > > The first message is because I have not updated lintian yet. The > second one is a violation. You should point to > /usr/share

RE: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 06-Feb-2001 Chewie wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:02:05AM -0800, David Whedon wrote: >> I'm happy to sponsor you. > > OK. The packages are available at: > > http://www.wookimus.net/debian/ > > They are not yet apt-get'able, as I have not taken the time to figure > out scanpackages

Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Chewie
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:31:37AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > try running lintian on your packages: > > W: gtimer source: newer-standards-version 3.5.0 > E: gtimer: copyright-refers-to-old-directory Updated and ready: http://www.wookimus.net/debian Source: gtimer Binary: gtimer Archite

Re: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Chewie
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 11:31:37AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > W: gtimer source: newer-standards-version 3.5.0 > E: gtimer: copyright-refers-to-old-directory > > The first message is because I have not updated lintian yet. The > second one is a violation. You should point to > /usr/shar

RE: Package ready for critique/testing: gtimer_1.1.5-1

2001-02-06 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 06-Feb-2001 Chewie wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 12:02:05AM -0800, David Whedon wrote: >> I'm happy to sponsor you. > > OK. The packages are available at: > > http://www.wookimus.net/debian/ > > They are not yet apt-get'able, as I have not taken the time to figure > out scanpackage