On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:58:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I guess the binary needs to be setuid in order to write into score file.
> >You have to do it... according to debian policy, games should be
> >setuid games in order to write to score file
Hello Peter,
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 03:10:40PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> It's very easy to install a chroot potato within your slink
> machine. That's what I do to build packages. Start with the
> instructions below (probably not placing the tree under /tmp if
> you want to keep it)
Hello Colin,
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:58:44PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> That's set*g*id. Policy 5.10 explicitly says that games must not be
> setuid.
Thanks for the pointer. I guess I should have taken a much closer look
at the policy manual. Mea culpa.
This means I'll have to
Hello Sean,
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 11:30:24AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> simply place your name as maintainer in the control file and make sure your
> name is the one listed in the changelog for the version you release.
Ah, so nothing is official until the package actually gets
Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 02:16:50PM -0400, Rene Weber wrote:
>> Also, umoria is (to my reading) non-free. The licence forbids it from
>> being used in a commercial manner (see below for an excerpt from my
>> debian/copyright file). Is this a problem?
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I figured this might save some people some time. If you want to
> set up a small debian install to see if your build dependancies
> work in the real world, or to find out what build deps your
> package needs in the first place, just type the
Rene Weber wrote:
> (3) I have slink (stable) installed on my debian machines, so of course
> umoria is compiled against older libraries. Is this a problem? I can
> upgrade one of the machines to unstable if necessary, but that machine is a
> lot slower, so I'd really rather not.
It's very
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 02:16:50PM -0400, Rene Weber wrote:
> Hello,
>
...
>
> Also, umoria is (to my reading) non-free. The licence forbids it from
> being used in a commercial manner (see below for an excerpt from my
> debian/copyright file). Is this a problem? The binary is also s
> So, my first question is how do I pick up a package that hasn't been
> orphaned? In my reply to the current developer, I asked him if he could
> orphan it, but he hasn't replied yet, and he may not know the procedure
> anyways. Is it possible for me to grab it from him based on his private
9 matches
Mail list logo
