Re: question about conflicts/dependencies

2006-11-05 Thread Neil Williams
On 05/11/06 19:26:52, Kevin Coyner wrote: On my sid box, I had apt-file v. 2.0.8 installed. A new version 2.0.8.1 became available, but apt-get [dist-]upgrade did not install it. To resolve it not upgrading, I apt-get remove'd it. Probably no need to remove it, just use install to update th

question about conflicts/dependencies

2006-11-05 Thread Kevin Coyner
I have a question about conflicts and dependencies ... Here's the situation: On my sid box, I had apt-file v. 2.0.8 installed. A new version 2.0.8.1 became available, but apt-get [dist-]upgrade did not install it. To resolve it not upgrading, I apt-get remove'd it. Next I apt-get

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-15 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases of > > B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B between "r" and "s" > > but not with release "q" of B (where p < q < r < s)? > > > > Thanks. > > Could you not simply say

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
> Question for dpkg gurus: > > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases of > B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B between "r" and "s" > but not with release "q" of B (where p < q < r < s)? > > Thanks. Could you not simply say that your package conflict

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-12 Thread Ben Collins
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 04:58:26PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with > > > > > releases of > > > > > B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B between "r" and "s" > > > > > but not with release "q" of B (where p < q < r < s

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-12 Thread Santiago Vila
> > > > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases > > > > of > > > > B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B between "r" and "s" > > > > but not with release "q" of B (where p < q < r < s)? > > > > > > AFAIK, dpkg can't even do 'all releases between r and s

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-12 Thread Shaleh
On 12-Mar-99 Santiago Vila wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > >> On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: >> >> > Question for dpkg gurus: >> > >> > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases of >> > B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-12 Thread Jules Bean
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > > > On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > Question for dpkg gurus: > > > > > > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases of > > > B earlier than "p" and also with all

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-12 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > Question for dpkg gurus: > > > > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases of > > B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B between "r" and "s" > > but not with release

Re: Question about conflicts

1999-03-12 Thread Jules Bean
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > Question for dpkg gurus: > > It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases of > B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B between "r" and "s" > but not with release "q" of B (where p < q < r < s)? > AFAIK, dpkg can't

Question about conflicts

1999-03-12 Thread Santiago Vila
Question for dpkg gurus: It is technically possible to make package A to conflict with releases of B earlier than "p" and also with all releases of B between "r" and "s" but not with release "q" of B (where p < q < r < s)? Thanks. -- "022212d3917d9cc0dac13e25739e814a" (a truly random sig)