Marco Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
> porters not to
Marco Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
> Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
> porters not t
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:29:15PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> * Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
> > Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> > ported to certain architectures?
>
Some software cannot be easily ported to any architectures.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:01:40AM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources.
*shrug* The build daemons override it anyway. I don't see a point in
inflating it into an issue of political correctness like Geert seems to
want to do; if it doesn't work for some
"J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources. But I am curious how one
> tests on various platforms. All of my machines are x86 and PowerPC (and
> it's dead at the moment). Then of course I could use the compile farm at
> SourceForge.
If you
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> >* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> >
> >> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> >> ported to certain architectures?
> >
> >Sorry, perhaps I should
At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
>> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
>> ported to certain architectures?
>
>Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
>porters not to try
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> ported to certain architectures?
Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
porters not to try to build a certain package? (For example,
when the p
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:01:40AM -0600, J. Scott Edwards wrote:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources.
*shrug* The build daemons override it anyway. I don't see a point in
inflating it into an issue of political correctness like Geert seems to
want to do; if it doesn't work for some
"J. Scott Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree that one shouldn't restrict the sources. But I am curious how one
> tests on various platforms. All of my machines are x86 and PowerPC (and
> it's dead at the moment). Then of course I could use the compile farm at
> SourceForge.
If yo
At 22:35 +0200 9/11/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>Dear mentors,
>
>I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
>prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
>Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
>architectures for all the packages that my
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Geert Stappers wrote:
> At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> >* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> >
> >> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> >> ported to certain architectures?
> >
> >Sorry, perhaps I should
At 14:29 +0200 9/12/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
>
>> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
>> ported to certain architectures?
>
>Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
>porters not to try
* Geert Stappers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-09-12 13:48:43 +0200):
> Could you tell us why you want prevent free software being
> ported to certain architectures?
Sorry, perhaps I should reformulate my question: How do I tell
porters not to try to build a certain package? (For example,
when the
At 22:35 +0200 9/11/02, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
>Dear mentors,
>
>I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
>prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
>Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
>architectures for all the packages that m
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:35:20PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all the packages that m
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 13:35, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all t
Dear mentors,
I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
architectures for all the packages that my source package
provides? It does not seem to be po
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:35:20PM +0100, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all the packages that
On Wednesday 11 September 2002 13:35, Marco Kuhlmann wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
> prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
> Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
> architectures for all
Dear mentors,
I do not quite seem to understand what I have to do in order to
prevent a source package being ported to certain architectures.
Do I have to write Architecture entries for the supported
architectures for all the packages that my source package
provides? It does not seem to be p
22 matches
Mail list logo