Re: Python package status

2004-07-23 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > * Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]: > > > There is a python policy that you should probably read. > > Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could > not find that there. But after searching

Re: Python package status

2004-07-23 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > * Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]: > > > There is a python policy that you should probably read. > > Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could > not find that there. But after searching

Re: Python package status

2004-07-23 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]: > There is a python policy that you should probably read. Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could not find that there. But after searching around, I found http://people.debian.org/~joss/python/python-pol

Re: Python package status

2004-07-23 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
* Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-21 01:45:58 +0200]: > There is a python policy that you should probably read. Thanks. I have checked at http://www.debian.org/devel/ , but I could not find that there. But after searching around, I found http://people.debian.org/~joss/python/python-pol

Re: Python package status

2004-07-20 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > I would like to ask advice with Python. I have a package, which depends > on it, and previously I depended on an exact version (2.3) thus altered > the interpreter in each file to be python2.3 instead of generic python. > It worked, but upstr

Python package status

2004-07-20 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
Dear Mentors, I would like to ask advice with Python. I have a package, which depends on it, and previously I depended on an exact version (2.3) thus altered the interpreter in each file to be python2.3 instead of generic python. It worked, but upstream put extra effort into that it should work w

Re: Python package status

2004-07-20 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote: > I would like to ask advice with Python. I have a package, which depends > on it, and previously I depended on an exact version (2.3) thus altered > the interpreter in each file to be python2.3 instead of generic python. > It worked, but upstr

Python package status

2004-07-20 Thread Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi
Dear Mentors, I would like to ask advice with Python. I have a package, which depends on it, and previously I depended on an exact version (2.3) thus altered the interpreter in each file to be python2.3 instead of generic python. It worked, but upstream put extra effort into that it should work w