Hello Sven,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:01:32PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Am 28.05.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > The reason is the following in the preinst (which I inherited, so if
> > it is wrong, I gladly rewrite/i
Am 28.05.2009 um 20:16 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> I don't know why this preinst script is necessary, but if you need to
>> insure that the new update-alternatives script is run in it, you have to
>> use Pre-Depends rather than Depen
Hello Sven,
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I don't know why this preinst script is necessary, but if you need to
> insure that the new update-alternatives script is run in it, you have to
> use Pre-Depends rather than Depends. See Policy ยง 7.2.
Thanks, I missed th
Am 28.05.2009 um 19:34 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
> in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
> error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
> prepared a new package, but this of course
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
> in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
> error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
> prepared a new package, but this of c
Hello,
I recently got an RC bug (#530653) which turned out to be a change
in dpkg's update-alternative (the string and output channel of an
error message was changed which is used in the preinst). So I
prepared a new package, but this of course will only work with the
dpkg in unstable (not the o
6 matches
Mail list logo
