On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:26:03PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > Do it. There's not much reason to use the close command, when
> > you can just email -done.
>
> Hmm, don't know wether i'm doing the right thing, but i'm currently
> mailing
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:26:03PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
> > > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> > >
> > > If this abuse continues, I might just exercise my ability to
> > > disable the c
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> >
> > If this abuse continues, I might j
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:26:03PM +0200, Martin Albert wrote:
> > > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> > >
> > > If this abuse continues, I might just exercise my ability to
> > > disable the
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> >
> > If this abuse continues, I might
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:18:05PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really fixed but
> > just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets the subject line,
> > and that's
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really fixed but
> just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets the subject line,
> and that's hardly nice. Especially when you tell people "this is a dead
> package,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really fixed but
> just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets the subject line,
> and that's hardly nice. Especially when you tell people "this is a dead
> package
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:40:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really fixed but
> > just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets the subject line,
> > and that's hardly nice. Especially when you tell people "this is a dead
> > pa
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:40:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really fixed but
> > just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets the subject line,
> > and that's hardly nice. Especially when you tell people "this is a dead
> > p
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really fixed but
> just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets the subject line,
> and that's hardly nice. Especially when you tell people "this is a dead
> package, we won't help you, go find something else
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really fixed but
> just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets the subject line,
> and that's hardly nice. Especially when you tell people "this is a dead
> package, we won't help you, go find something els
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:33:07PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > close 60852
> > Bug#60852: glimpse: full of temp races
> > Bug closed, send any further explanations t
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:33:07PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > close 60852
> > Bug#60852: glimpse: full of temp races
> > Bug closed, send any further explanations
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:33:07PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > close 60852
> Bug#60852: glimpse: full of temp races
> Bug closed, send any further explanations to Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
[snipped a lot of the same]
People! Y
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 04:33:07PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > close 60852
> Bug#60852: glimpse: full of temp races
> Bug closed, send any further explanations to Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
[snipped a lot of the same]
People!
16 matches
Mail list logo
