Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-03-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 02:44:03PM -0900, Britton wrote: > > > The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to > users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be > more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this > package h

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-03-02 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 02:44:03PM -0900, Britton wrote: > > > The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to > users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be > more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this > package

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-25 Thread Britton
The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this package has been modified since the package was installed' or something like t

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-25 Thread Britton
The 'edited by you or by a script line' which currently gets served up to users is apparently not quite in line with policy. It would probably be more appropriate to say somethine like 'The configuration file for this package has been modified since the package was installed' or something like

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the > > squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles. > > If it's necessary to remove it fro

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:42:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated > > editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since > > asking 'Would

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:19:08PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the > > squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles. > > If it's necessary to remove it fr

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 01:42:01PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > > It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated > > editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since > > asking 'Would

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the > squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles. If it's necessary to remove it from conffiles in order to edit it from a script in /usr/sbin, then both sgml

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread calvin
Aaron, On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated > editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since > asking 'Would you like to enable this package by inserting a line FOO > into /etc/

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread Ove Kaaven
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you really think you want to change this automatically, you can ask the > squid maintainer to remove /etc/squid.conf from his conffiles. If it's necessary to remove it from conffiles in order to edit it from a script in /usr/sbin, then both sgm

Re: Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-24 Thread calvin
Aaron, On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 02:02:53PM -0800, Aaron Lehmann wrote: > It seems this is at odds with policy, which prohibutes the automated > editing of conffiles (such as squid.conf). This is a bit ironic, since > asking 'Would you like to enable this package by inserting a line FOO > into /etc

Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-23 Thread Aaron Lehmann
I am attempting to package a simple Squid redirector. To have any function whatsoever, a directive must be inserted into squid.conf declaring it as a redirector. I had envisioned a nice debconf question showing the line that would be inserted and asking for the admin's permission to do so. It seem

Policy and conffile editing

2001-02-23 Thread Aaron Lehmann
I am attempting to package a simple Squid redirector. To have any function whatsoever, a directive must be inserted into squid.conf declaring it as a redirector. I had envisioned a nice debconf question showing the line that would be inserted and asking for the admin's permission to do so. It see