On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:12:57PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Expat 1.x was never packaged as a shared library by its upstream
> > maintainer. [...] Basically, expat 1.x was designed to be used exactly
> > as I'm using it--as an internal library.
>
Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Expat 1.x was never packaged as a shared library by its upstream
> maintainer. [...] Basically, expat 1.x was designed to be used
> exactly as I'm using it--as an internal library.
Ah, I was ignorant of this. This makes your decision much more
understandabl
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:12:57PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Expat 1.x was never packaged as a shared library by its upstream
> > maintainer. [...] Basically, expat 1.x was designed to be used exactly
> > as I'm using it--as an internal library.
>
Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Expat 1.x was never packaged as a shared library by its upstream
> maintainer. [...] Basically, expat 1.x was designed to be used
> exactly as I'm using it--as an internal library.
Ah, I was ignorant of this. This makes your decision much more
understandab
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Would you think it a good strategy for an xmlrpc-c application to link
> statically with its own version of your library, because there are
> set-ups out there which have a too old, too new, too screwed
> installation of xmlrpc-c?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:27:21PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Would you think it a good strategy for an xmlrpc-c application to link
> statically with its own version of your library, because there are
> set-ups out there which have a too old, too new, too screwed
> installation of xmlrpc-c?
Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) xmlrpc-c applications must run on distros which provide a copy of
> libexpat, and ones which don't. Since the libexpat sonames have not
> been incremented in a correct manner on all distributions, it's
> extremely hard for me rely on pre
Eric Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) xmlrpc-c applications must run on distros which provide a copy of
> libexpat, and ones which don't. Since the libexpat sonames have not
> been incremented in a correct manner on all distributions, it's
> extremely hard for me rely on pr
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, as maintainer of the expat and libxmltok packages I would
> > really appreciate it if you could make an effort to use the
> > standalone copy.
>
> What he said! It avoids
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:54:43PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to build
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, as maintainer of the expat and libxmltok packages I would
> > really appreciate it if you could make an effort to use the
> > standalone copy.
>
> What he said! It avoids
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to build
> > binaries t
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:54:43PM -0500, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to buil
Ardo van Rangelrooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 5) xmlrpc-c includes its own copy of expat (under a different soname) for
> > binary compatibility with other Linux versions. I'd prefer not to
> > change this, because it would make it hard for my users to build
> > binaries
Eric Kidd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello!
Hi!
> I'm the author of xmlrpc-c, a library implementing XML-RPC for C and C++.
> (XML-RPC is a simple RPC protocol typically used for talking to web
> applications. It works by sending XML messages over HTTP, which is a bit
> of a strange way to do
Eric Kidd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello!
Hi!
> I'm the author of xmlrpc-c, a library implementing XML-RPC for C and C++.
> (XML-RPC is a simple RPC protocol typically used for talking to web
> applications. It works by sending XML messages over HTTP, which is a bit
> of a strange way to do
Hello!
I'm the author of xmlrpc-c, a library implementing XML-RPC for C and C++.
(XML-RPC is a simple RPC protocol typically used for talking to web
applications. It works by sending XML messages over HTTP, which is a bit
of a strange way to do things, but it's nice for talking to Zope and
simila
Hello!
I'm the author of xmlrpc-c, a library implementing XML-RPC for C and C++.
(XML-RPC is a simple RPC protocol typically used for talking to web
applications. It works by sending XML messages over HTTP, which is a bit
of a strange way to do things, but it's nice for talking to Zope and
simil
18 matches
Mail list logo
