Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-29 Thread Jan Kesten
Justin Pryzby wrote: > dh_compress(1): "you can specify on the command line" (but it probably > wants a relative path for files in the build directory, like > usr/share/mailinglists/*). I tried that - and it didn't work. But some times I should read what I have really written, simply forgot a sin

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-28 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:33:29PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote: > Hi Justin and others! 'ello, > > Right again. No reason for mailinglists to depend on a relational SQL > > DB. (Since I can do perfectly good search with zgrep). If you want > > to allow users to import them into SQL, I recommend pro

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-28 Thread Jan Kesten
Hi Justin and others! > server, and asks "Do you want to run the sshd server". It is > probably, at best, borderline acceptable to ask "In what formats do > you want to make the mailinglists available". I agree in that. > This is the right idea. Provide a package which includes the "source" >

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jan Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> 0.1 would normaly mean it is an experimental version before the first >> release. 1.0 would be the first real release with that scheme. Some > > I think I'll use this scheme then, right now everything is very > experimental

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-24 Thread Jan Kesten
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > 0.1 would normaly mean it is an experimental version before the first > release. 1.0 would be the first real release with that scheme. Some I think I'll use this scheme then, right now everything is very experimental and far from complete :-) And while creating them

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-24 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote: > Hi again, 'ello. FWIW the X.1 numbering scheme is usually for NMU uploads (but that probably doesn't apply to native packages?) [...] > > Do you have a reader interface for the mbox files? Maybe the scripts > > from lists.debian.org s

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jan Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello :-) > >> That should be "./debian-user-200202-1" and "debian-user-german-200202 >> (1) unstable; urgency=low" then I think. > > Just a minute before your mail I tried following: > > ./debian-user-200202-0.1 > debian-user-german-200202 (0.1) unstable;

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-24 Thread Jan Kesten
Hello :-) > That should be "./debian-user-200202-1" and "debian-user-german-200202 > (1) unstable; urgency=low" then I think. Just a minute before your mail I tried following: ./debian-user-200202-0.1 debian-user-german-200202 (0.1) unstable; urgency=low And that worked fine - it just a differn

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-24 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jan Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, Goswin and others, > >> You don't have a debian-user-german-200202.orig.tar.gz so the package >> is detected as native package. That means that the full version >> (200202-1) is taken as upstream version and the directory is expected >> to be name

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-24 Thread Jan Kesten
Martin Mewes wrote: > Big Mewes is watching you ;-) > I am proud you being a member to my mbox-project :-) LOL - quite funny who two different projects exist aside doing nearly the same :-) Cheers, Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Hello, Goswin and others, > You don't have a debian-user-german-200202.orig.tar.gz so the package > is detected as native package. That means that the full version > (200202-1) is taken as upstream version and the directory is expected > to be names such. Ok :-) (learned at lot this weekend :

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Hello, Goswin and others, > You don't have a debian-user-german-200202.orig.tar.gz so the package > is detected as native package. That means that the full version > (200202-1) is taken as upstream version and the directory is expected > to be names such. Ok :-) (learned at lot this weekend :

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Hi again, > Why under doc? Compare with > > /usr/share/keyrings/ > /usr/share/images/ > /usr/share/sounds/ > ... > > Not all mailinglists would be documentary in nature. Right, then something like /usr/share/mailinglists or like that would be more appropriate indeed. > Do you have a reader int

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jan Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Justin, ... > Some thing I didn't mentioned before: > > dpkg-source: warning: source directory `./debian-user-german-200202' is > not - `debian-user-german-200202-1' > > Is it better to use underscores like debian_user_german-200202? > > Cheers, > Jan Y

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jan Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > at first thanks Magnus and Frank for the hint to find a documentaion > only package to look at. Finally I managed to get working packages, that > install mbox-archives of mailinglists under /usr/share/doc/mailinglists > > (by the way: is this the ri

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Justin Pryzby wrote: > It seems its not a native package? I think the changelog is consulted > to get the package version (but it must agree with the control file > and the directory name?). Meh, apt-get source debian-goodies for > details:) I took a look :-) And if I change the directory name

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Martin Mewes
Hi Jan, Jan Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > Didn't know you are subscribed here :-) So just another hello to you, > I'm just writing some lines for extracting mails out of the mboxes - > hopefully it will work end of the week :-) Big Mewes is watching you ;-) I am proud you being a member to

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Hi Martin :-) > http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-) Didn't know you are subscribed here :-) So just another hello to you, I'm just writing some lines for extracting mails out of the mboxes - hopefully it will work end of the week :-) Cheers, Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Jan Kesten [Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:00:31 +0100]: > Hi Justin, > > So, you're subscribed to a whole bunch of lists, and you store the > > messages yourself? Ideally, mbox files would be publically available > > from www.debian.org, but I can't find them if that's the case. http://mbox.mewes.tv/

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:00:31PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote: > > .deb. The .deb *is* the source package, just with a control file > > and a copyright file and whatever, and compressed and relocated as > > necessary to /usr/share/. > > ACK. Forgot to mention - since my package uses dh_compress t

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Martin Mewes
Hi Jan, Jan Kesten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > I looked there, but I don't think there are any. That's why we > startet collecting and syncing them (I know there are archives > accessible for DDs). First idea was to put them on a server where > everybody could fetch them - not 5 minutes later "

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Hi Justin, > So, you're subscribed to a whole bunch of lists, and you store the > messages yourself? Ideally, mbox files would be publically available > from www.debian.org, but I can't find them if that's the case. I looked there, but I don't think there are any. That's why we startet collecti

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 05:08:15PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote: > Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > Nice idea. Where do you get the mbox from? > > By now I archiving or better buliding up an archive of different > mailinglists. Right now they are stored in a database for easy checking > if there are new ma

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Justin Pryzby wrote: > Nice idea. Where do you get the mbox from? By now I archiving or better buliding up an archive of different mailinglists. Right now they are stored in a database for easy checking if there are new mails to be added to a specific month. > Seems okay with me. Fine :-) > d

Re: Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:09:59PM +0100, Jan Kesten wrote: > > Hi, > > at first thanks Magnus and Frank for the hint to find a documentaion > only package to look at. Finally I managed to get working packages, that > install mbox-archives of mailinglists under /usr/share/doc/mailinglists Nice id

Packaging of mailinglist archives

2005-01-23 Thread Jan Kesten
Hi, at first thanks Magnus and Frank for the hint to find a documentaion only package to look at. Finally I managed to get working packages, that install mbox-archives of mailinglists under /usr/share/doc/mailinglists (by the way: is this the right list for questions like this? If not just tell