Re: Packaging a perl-script

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:46:58PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However this is only 40KB (with pod) and I think it might be rejected > > by ftp-master. - Are there any better possibilities? > Why should they reject it? "Only 40kb" is not a reason.

Re: Packaging a perl-script

On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 01:46:58PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > However this is only 40KB (with pod) and I think it might be rejected > > by ftp-master. - Are there any better possibilities? > Why should they reject it? "Only 40kb" is not a reason.

Re: Packaging a perl-script

Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However this is only 40KB (with pod) and I think it might be rejected > by ftp-master. - Are there any better possibilities? Why should they reject it? "Only 40kb" is not a reason. (If its split out from another source into too small packages, then y

Re: Packaging a perl-script

Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However this is only 40KB (with pod) and I think it might be rejected > by ftp-master. - Are there any better possibilities? Why should they reject it? "Only 40kb" is not a reason. (If its split out from another source into too small packages, then y

Packaging a perl-script

Hello, I'd like to see http://www.jetmore.org/john/code/swaks (Swiss Army Knife SMTP) in Debian. As the name suggests this is a wonderful tool to test SMTP servers (including starttls and lots of SMTP auth), for all of us who are tired of "telnet foo 25". ;-) However this is only 40KB (with pod) a

Packaging a perl-script

Hello, I'd like to see http://www.jetmore.org/john/code/swaks (Swiss Army Knife SMTP) in Debian. As the name suggests this is a wonderful tool to test SMTP servers (including starttls and lots of SMTP auth), for all of us who are tired of "telnet foo 25". ;-) However this is only 40KB (with pod) a