Re: Packaging .deb vs .rpm - Re: C library for numerical analysis and math

2004-02-08 Thread Florent Rougon
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, I know I wouldn't want to spend time learning _two_ > packaging systems - .deb (and .tar of course) are surely enough? It seems you don't realize that converting from one packaging system to another and hoping the results works correctly in mos

Re: Packaging .deb vs .rpm - Re: C library for numerical analysis and math

2004-02-08 Thread Florent Rougon
Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyway, I know I wouldn't want to spend time learning _two_ > packaging systems - .deb (and .tar of course) are surely enough? It seems you don't realize that converting from one packaging system to another and hoping the results works correctly in mos

Packaging .deb vs .rpm - Re: C library for numerical analysis and math

2004-02-07 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 07:49, R. Wood wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:36:11AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness imagined: > > On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 22:48, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > #include > > > > Zenaan Harkness [Sat, Feb 07 2004, 04:20:47AM]: > > > > > > > > > sys-admins on Linux systems, and they feel

Packaging .deb vs .rpm - Re: C library for numerical analysis and math

2004-02-07 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 07:49, R. Wood wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:36:11AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness imagined: > > On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 22:48, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > #include > > > > Zenaan Harkness [Sat, Feb 07 2004, 04:20:47AM]: > > > > > > > > > sys-admins on Linux systems, and they feel