Hi Filip,
otherwise, I would just sponsor you upload(s) in the meantime. Justping
me if needed.
Cheers
Ole
Filip Hroch writes:
> Hi Sebastian, and Andrey,
>
> thank you very much for that help. I decided to practise my patience,
> there's no hurry for Fitspng upload.
>
>
> Sebastian Ramacher
Hi Sebastian, and Andrey,
thank you very much for that help. I decided to practise my
patience,
there's no hurry for Fitspng upload.
Sebastian Ramacher writes:
On 2022-02-02 16:20:15 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Filip Hroch wrote:
...
When a
On 2022-02-02 16:20:15 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Filip Hroch wrote:
> > I'm attempting to upload Fitspng into ftp-master, unfortunately, without any
> > success. Moreover, I haven't received any message why the upload has been
> > rejected, or anyt
Hi Filip
On 2022-02-02 11:50:47 +0100, Filip Hroch wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> I'm attempting to upload Fitspng into ftp-master, unfortunately, without any
> success. Moreover, I haven't received any message why the upload has been
> rejected, or anything else. I has understand it could be caus
On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 11:50:47AM +0100, Filip Hroch wrote:
> I'm attempting to upload Fitspng into ftp-master, unfortunately, without any
> success. Moreover, I haven't received any message why the upload has been
> rejected, or anything else.
When a valid signature is not found the uploader ind
Dear Colleagues,
I'm attempting to upload Fitspng into ftp-master, unfortunately,
without any
success. Moreover, I haven't received any message why the upload
has been
rejected, or anything else. I has understand it could be caused by
GPG key
expiration, but I'm not sure if another action shou
Am Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:15:16 +0100
schrieb Roman Ondráček :
> Matthias, I'm sorry I didn't answer you because I was busy examining
> at university.
> I sent two emails to the sponsor requesting to upload the package, but
> he didn't respond because he is probably busy.
Thanks for the response.
Wh
Hi,
Matthias, I'm sorry I didn't answer you because I was busy examining at
university.
I sent two emails to the sponsor requesting to upload the package, but
he didn't respond because he is probably busy.
Adam, thanks for upload.
--
Best regards,
Roman Ondráček
Dne 08. 02. 21 v 20:22 Adam Boro
Am 8. Februar 2021 20:22:48 schrieb Adam Borowski :
I've just uploaded 1.3.8-1.
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Matthias
On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Matthias Klein wrote:
> Hello Roman,
>
> thank you for preparing the update to version 1.3.8 in git [1].
>
> Since you don't answer my mails, I would like to try again via the bug
> tracker and the mailing list.
>
> What is the reason that the package d
Hello Roman,
thank you for preparing the update to version 1.3.8 in git [1].
Since you don't answer my mails, I would like to try again via the bug tracker
and the mailing list.
What is the reason that the package does not make it from the Mentors site [2]
to the Debian archive for weeks?
Is t
Am 03.11.2020 um 05:32 teilte Eriberto mit:
Hi,
I found these lines in logs inside mirror.ftp-master.debian.org:
20201031231816|process-upload|dak|proftpd-mod-
proxy_0.7-1_source.changes|Error while loading changes file
proftpd-mod-proxy_0.7-1_source.changes: No valid signature found.
(GPG
Em ter., 3 de nov. de 2020 às 00:33, Brian Smith
escreveu:
>
> Hi Hilmar,
>
> I had this problem when my signing key expired. The upload fails silently.
A good catch Brian!
I found these lines in logs inside mirror.ftp-master.debian.org:
20201031231816|process-upload|dak|proftpd-mod-proxy_0.7-
Hi Hilmar,
I had this problem when my signing key expired. The upload fails silently.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:44 PM Eriberto wrote:
> Em seg., 2 de nov. de 2020 às 20:51, Hilmar Preuße
> escreveu:
> >
> > the day before yesterday I uploaded the new version of a package. The
> > email "Process
Em seg., 2 de nov. de 2020 às 20:51, Hilmar Preuße escreveu:
>
> the day before yesterday I uploaded the new version of a package. The
> email "Processing of proftpd-mod-proxy_0.7-1_source.changes" came in,
> nothing else: neither rejected nor accepted.
>
> Re-upload or still wait? Thanks!
Hi Hil
Hi,
the day before yesterday I uploaded the new version of a package. The
email "Processing of proftpd-mod-proxy_0.7-1_source.changes" came in,
nothing else: neither rejected nor accepted.
Re-upload or still wait? Thanks!
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi Baptiste,
Thanks for reaching out this efficiently, I already saw that package was
imported to ftp. Appreciating support for me:)
Woodrow
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 3:11 PM Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote:
> Hi Woodrow,
>
> On 3/7/20 7:11 AM, Woodrow Shen wrote:
> > I've just uploaded my package pdf2dj
Hi Woodrow,
On 3/7/20 7:11 AM, Woodrow Shen wrote:
> I've just uploaded my package pdf2djvu 0.9.17-1 to mentors.debian.net via
> ftp, and after more than a hour I don't receive any notification from
> email and I realize that uploading package seems to be working-in-progress
> on server. Can some
Hi mentors,
I've just uploaded my package pdf2djvu 0.9.17-1 to mentors.debian.net via
ftp, and after more than a hour I don't receive any notification from
email and I realize that uploading package seems to be working-in-progress
on server. Can someone help me to identify this issue? Or how to s
>Sorry to have bothered you. All answers are in
>https://mentors.debian.net/qa
I'm quite busy right now, good luck with mentors uploads :)
G.
Albert van der Horst schreef op 2017-10-23 15:12:
Concerns:
Debian Bug report logs - #859130
ITP: lina -- iso-compliant Forth interpreter and compiler
Gianfranco Costamagna schreef op 2017-10-10 08:15:
Hello,
At last I have a debian archive for lina that is generated using
proper
procedures
Concerns:
Debian Bug report logs - #859130
ITP: lina -- iso-compliant Forth interpreter and compiler
Gianfranco Costamagna schreef op 2017-10-10 08:15:
Hello,
At last I have a debian archive for lina that is generated using
proper
procedures
(debhelper, quilt etc.) from the (upstream) source
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> The active Debian keyring is available in /srv/keyring.debian.org/ on some
> *.debian.org machines; so if you are a DD, you check status of the key:
People without access to *.d.o machines can access the keyring via rsync:
http://keyring.debia
* Tomasz Buchert , 2015-10-25, 17:50:
this happened to me as well. When your key is expired you don't get
*anything* back, it's just like that. Moreover it takes some time for
your key to be included in the keyring: the new keyring is uploaded
once every one/two months [1].
To clarify, ftp-ma
Hi, let me know if you need a sponsor.
quick review:
- priority should be optional I guess
- copyright is outdated, and also
"repackaged to exclude copies of jquery, bootstrap, elycharts and raphael"
needs an update
- watch file should point to the get-orig-source target (look e.g. to
virtualbo
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 05:50:56PM +0100, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
Hello Tomasz,
> this happened to me as well. When your key is expired you don't get
> *anything* back, it's just like that. Moreover it takes some time for
> your key to be included in the keyring: the new keyring is uploaded
> once
* Andreas Moog , 2015-10-25, 17:28:
I am a Debian Maintainer and wanted to upload a new release of a
package I have upload rights to. The upload seemed successful:
"nzbget_16.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost"
but I didn't receive a second message that the upload was ac
On 25/10/15 17:28, Andreas Moog wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I am a Debian Maintainer and wanted to upload a new release of a package I
> have upload rights to. The upload seemed successful:
>
> "nzbget_16.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost"
>
> but I didn't receive a second mes
Hello there,
I am a Debian Maintainer and wanted to upload a new release of a package I
have upload rights to. The upload seemed successful:
"nzbget_16.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost"
but I didn't receive a second message that the upload was accepted, nor that
it was d
Hello,
For severals weeks (~begin of April), I'm not able to upload new
packages anymore.
Each time, I get :
Unfortunately your package "freefilesync" was rejected because of
the following
reason:
Your upload does not contain a valid signature. Output was:
gpg: ... using RSA key ID 33A7B
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:18:08PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Peter Pentchev [110426 15:49 +0300]:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> > > of my package "ripit".
>
* Peter Pentchev [110426 15:49 +0300]:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> > of my package "ripit".
> >
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > ripit - Textbased audio CD rip
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
Hi,
> It seems like lowercase would be the way to go. The description is not
> a sentence and capitalizing the first letter makes it feel like a
> sentence (when it is not one.)
> Since it now feels like a sentence, you also begin t
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:33:46 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
> > +Description: textbased audio CD ripper
> this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
> packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases.
> Maybe we should try to
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> Hey Peter,
>
>> -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
>> +Description: textbased audio CD ripper
>
> this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
> packag
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hey Peter,
> -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
> +Description: textbased audio CD ripper
this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases.
Maybe we sho
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> of my package "ripit".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
>
> This is an upload to unstable with no changes
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> of my package "ripit".
Uploaded, thanks.
Sven
--
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
[ Streetlight
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
of my package "ripit".
It builds these binary packages:
ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
This is an upload to unstable with no changes to the version which resides in
exparimental.
The package appears to be lintian clean
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.7.0-1
of my package "eagle". Also, would you be able to upload both amd64
and i386 .deb?
I submitted for this to be put on the non-free autobuild list, but it
have not heard back yet.
Upstream releases a binary that is usable as both i
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 12:46:32 +1000]:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:43:08AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >Check the list of binary packages of sidplay-libs at:
> >
> >http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sidplay-libs.html
> >
> >and you will see libresid-d
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 12:46:32 +1000]:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:43:08AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >Check the list of binary packages of sidplay-libs at:
> >
> >http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sidplay-libs.html
> >
> >and you will see libresid-d
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:43:08AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>Check the list of binary packages of sidplay-libs at:
>
>http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sidplay-libs.html
>
>and you will see libresid-dev listed there.
Which is a package you are taking over from ivo.
Sorry for the noise
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 09:35:08PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
>Hi,
>
> My sponsor uploaded sidplay related packages for me. It was like before
>with other packages: I get a message that the upload was ok, then that
>it was accepted. However for two binary packages I get this snippshet:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 11:43:08AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>Check the list of binary packages of sidplay-libs at:
>
>http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sidplay-libs.html
>
>and you will see libresid-dev listed there.
Which is a package you are taking over from ivo.
Sorry for the noise
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 09:35:08PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
>Hi,
>
> My sponsor uploaded sidplay related packages for me. It was like before
>with other packages: I get a message that the upload was ok, then that
>it was accepted. However for two binary packages I get this snippshet:
Hi,
My sponsor uploaded sidplay related packages for me. It was like before
with other packages: I get a message that the upload was ok, then that
it was accepted. However for two binary packages I get this snippshet:
-- snip --
(new) libresid-dev_2.1.0-3_i386.deb optional devel
WARNING: Already
Hi,
My sponsor uploaded sidplay related packages for me. It was like before
with other packages: I get a message that the upload was ok, then that
it was accepted. However for two binary packages I get this snippshet:
-- snip --
(new) libresid-dev_2.1.0-3_i386.deb optional devel
WARNING: Already
Hi,
At "deb http://www.burtonini.com/debian /" are the following packages:
* desktop-file-utils 0.3-3
* doclifter 1.0.0-2
If a kind DD would like to check these updates and upload them, I'd be a
happy wanting-to-be-a-debian-developer. :)
MD5 checksums:
a1c8bcd648da58bfe0b142042292caa8 desktop
Hi,
At "deb http://www.burtonini.com/debian /" are the following packages:
* desktop-file-utils 0.3-3
* doclifter 1.0.0-2
If a kind DD would like to check these updates and upload them, I'd be a
happy wanting-to-be-a-debian-developer. :)
MD5 checksums:
a1c8bcd648da58bfe0b142042292caa8 deskto
>
> What happens to a package after uploading?
>
> I've uploaded a new package called snmptraplogd.
> Can I see the state of the package online?
>
> Bernd Schumacher
You can see the package waiting to be moved into its appropriate place in
/home/Debian/ftp/private/project/Incoming
When it
What happens to a package after uploading?
I've uploaded a new package called snmptraplogd.
Can I see the state of the package online?
Bernd Schumacher
52 matches
Mail list logo
