On Thu, 25 Feb, 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 09:25:12PM -0800, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > this is the last issue holding up my libggi debs. Upon a complete
> > build, the only scary thing lintian barfs is this:
> >
> > W: libggi2: package-relation-
On Thu, Feb 25, 1999 at 01:21:13PM -0500, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> > More than likely you have a binary in this package that uses the
> > library (also in this package). If so, you might want to split the
> > binaries (and other files that aren't the .so) into a runtime package.
>
> I am not sure I un
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 07:45:42 -0500
> From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian Mentors
> Subject: Re: Package-relation-with-self, debhelper
> Resent-Date: 25 Feb 1999 12:38:48 -
> Resent-From: debian-mentors@list
On Wed, Feb 24, 1999 at 09:25:12PM -0800, Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote:
> Hello all
>
> this is the last issue holding up my libggi debs. Upon a complete
> build, the only scary thing lintian barfs is this:
>
> W: libggi2: package-relation-with-self depends: libggi2
>
> Will this cause any pr
Hello all
this is the last issue holding up my libggi debs. Upon a complete
build, the only scary thing lintian barfs is this:
W: libggi2: package-relation-with-self depends: libggi2
Will this cause any problems? If so, why does debhelper generate
dependencies in such a way that this occ
5 matches
Mail list logo