Re: Odd licenses in debian/copyright (and Format 1.0)

2013-05-06 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Gregor, On Sun, May 05, 2013 at 09:32:34PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 05 May 2013 20:45:50 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > > Looking > > at [1] I only see a finite list of licenses and for those cases (as > > far as I could determine) none matches. Unfortunately there is no >

Re: Odd licenses in debian/copyright (and Format 1.0)

2013-05-05 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sun, 05 May 2013 20:45:50 +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Looking > at [1] I only see a finite list of licenses and for those cases (as > far as I could determine) none matches. Unfortunately there is no > value like "other" to mark those license(s). How should/could I > proceed to switch over

Odd licenses in debian/copyright (and Format 1.0)

2013-05-05 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello, I'm in the process of converting "my" packages into the canonical copyright format[1]. I believe I understood the syntax and standard licenses like GPL are no problem. However, I have several non standard licenses, like [2], [3], [4] with some files from the FSF having a very restrictive li