Re: Obselete package

2003-07-21 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:15:00PM -0700, Keith Dunwoody wrote: > I want to adopt a group of related packages (the > abuse-related packages, in this case), but the > description of the "abuse" package says it has been > obseleted by abuse-sdl, and I would have to agree. I > think this package shou

Re: Obselete package

2003-07-21 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:15:00PM -0700, Keith Dunwoody wrote: > I want to adopt a group of related packages (the > abuse-related packages, in this case), but the > description of the "abuse" package says it has been > obseleted by abuse-sdl, and I would have to agree. I > think this package shou

Obselete package

2003-07-21 Thread Keith Dunwoody
Hi, I want to adopt a group of related packages (the abuse-related packages, in this case), but the description of the "abuse" package says it has been obseleted by abuse-sdl, and I would have to agree. I think this package should be removed, rather than being adopted. Should I file a request fo

Obselete package

2003-07-21 Thread Keith Dunwoody
Hi, I want to adopt a group of related packages (the abuse-related packages, in this case), but the description of the "abuse" package says it has been obseleted by abuse-sdl, and I would have to agree. I think this package should be removed, rather than being adopted. Should I file a request fo