Re: Bug#630167: Bug#629815: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so'

2011-06-23 Thread Modestas Vainius
close 630167 2.8.4+dfsg.1-5 thanks Hello, On ketvirtadienis 23 Birželis 2011 14:20:59 Andreas Tille wrote: > I tried to rebuild gofigure2 (which is affected by #629815) now I do > not get the > > No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by > `lib/libvtkRe

Re: Bug#629815: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so'

2011-06-23 Thread Andreas Tille
> released Ubuntu 11.04 (natty) already has this multiarch enabled so > upstream cmake up to and including 2.8.4 is basically unusable on > those systems. That's because libc6 package is multiarch enabled and > e.g. vanilla cmake 2.8.4 is not even able to set CMAKE_DL_LIBS > pr

Re: Bug#629815: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so'

2011-06-10 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:02:56PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> >> The problem is that libdl.so has been moved to the multiarch paths in >> >> libc6-dev 2.13-5.  You must upgrade cmake to 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3, have you >> >> done that already? >>

Re: Bug#629815: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so'

2011-06-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:02:56PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > >> The problem is that libdl.so has been moved to the multiarch paths in > >> libc6-dev 2.13-5. You must upgrade cmake to 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3, have you > >> done that already? > > > > I'm building an unstable pbuilder chroot. It is using

Multiarch with cmake seems to cause FTBFS (Was: Bug#629815: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so')

2011-06-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, in case people might wonder about strange FTBFS like #629815 (which does not seem to be the only bug of this type): There is a fair chance that this will solve with some (future?) cmake package version. Just to let you know before everybody needs to do the same investigation ... On Thu, Jun

Re: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so'

2011-06-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-06-09 11:19 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:00:40AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> >> The problem is that libdl.so has been moved to the multiarch paths in >> libc6-dev 2.13-5. You must upgrade cmake to 2.8.4+dfsg.1-3, have you >> done that already? > > I'm buildi

Bug#629815: Info received (No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so')

2011-06-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will rep

Re: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so'

2011-06-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:00:40AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > However, the problem I was facing in the not yet released package > > ginkocadx[1] seems to be quite common currently. It is in #629815 and > > some similar case happens in #618094 and thus I'm suspecting a general > > problem someh

Re: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so'

2011-06-09 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-06-09 08:11 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:26:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: >> > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by >> > `src

No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so' (Was: Failed to build Ginko CADx)

2011-06-08 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:26:22AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by > > `src/cadxcore/libCADxCore.so.2.4.1.1'. Stop. > > I sus