Re: Multiple ITP's

2010-08-17 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 05:07:03PM +0100, Chris Baines wrote: > > ITPs are meant for coordinating work on packages not in the archive, > > i.e. where there is no Maintainer (capital M) yet. If an updated > > source package adds new binaries, there is no need for an ITP. > By "splitting down

Re: Multiple ITP's

2010-08-16 Thread Chris Baines
On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 13:32 +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Chris Baines wrote: > > > In my attempt to update the Debian FlightGear packages I have decided it > > would be best to spilt the FlightGear base package down in to its > > different compon

Re: Multiple ITP's

2010-08-16 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Chris Baines wrote: > In my attempt to update the Debian FlightGear packages I have decided it > would be best to spilt the FlightGear base package down in to its > different components to allow for easier setup. ITPs are meant for coordinating work

Multiple ITP's

2010-08-16 Thread Chris Baines
Hello Mentors, In my attempt to update the Debian FlightGear packages I have decided it would be best to spilt the FlightGear base package down in to its different components to allow for easier setup. This means that I will be uploading at least 10 new packages for all the aircraft included in